When Ethereum Gas skyrockets to 100 gwei, users not only face transfer cost pressures but also suffer from high interaction fees with some mainstream DEXs and lending protocols. The real culprit behind this is often overlooked—the traditional oracle push model.



In this mode, as soon as prices fluctuate slightly, dozens of nodes simultaneously push data onto the chain, even if no transactions occur. This is undoubtedly a huge waste of block space.

So is there a better solution? The pull model offers an alternative approach:

First, data is stored off-chain. Only when a transaction is initiated is the necessary price data "pulled" onto the chain. This prevents redundant data accumulation and network congestion. Second, in terms of response speed, the pull mode directly accesses contract logic from node memory, avoiding the inherent latency of the push mode. This is especially critical for high-frequency traders—because that brief latency window is an opportunity for sandwich (MEV).

But how to solve the practical problem that lending protocols require real-time price monitoring? A hybrid solution has emerged—retaining push for the lending sector to ensure security, while switching high-frequency derivatives trading to the pull mode. This maintains the stability of the lending system while reducing costs for traders.

Next time you encounter a project still using traditional oracles, consider asking: with the optimization options in front of us, why not choose them?
ETH0,72%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PumpAnalystvip
· 13h ago
Projects still using Push oracle really need to reflect on their choices. Wasting block space with 100gwei gas isn't a technical issue; it's an attitude problem.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 13h ago
This hybrid solution sounds good, but you have to ask why giants like Chainlink don't actively promote this set... Is it due to technical difficulty or incompatible business models?
View OriginalReply0
WalletManagervip
· 13h ago
I've already said it, projects still using Push mode are not worthy of my private key. The few milliseconds window of MEV sandwiching directly erodes transaction profits. Without optimization, it's pointless. A hybrid approach is the right way.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTalkervip
· 13h ago
actually this hybrid oracle thing finally makes sense to me... pull for dex, push for lending. why didn't more protocols think of this sooner lol
Reply0
PerpetualLongervip
· 13h ago
It's the gas fee issue again, it's driving me crazy. Buying the dip every day is leading to bankruptcy... The pull mode sounds okay, but how much cheaper can it really be once implemented? We'll have to wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFanvip
· 13h ago
Ironically, there are actually projects that don't need to be used at all, they just love to pile up gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 13h ago
Alright, push mode really should be phased out; the gas fees are all eaten up by data feeding.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)