Recently, I have been frequently asked two types of questions in industry discussion groups: Can Bitcoin break through 70,000 this week? Is now the time to buy the dip or to exit? Honestly, most people asking these questions haven't grasped the fundamental laws governing the crypto market.



I have been in this field for 8 years and have witnessed three complete bull and bear cycles. To be responsible, Bitcoin's long-term trend has never depended on candlestick charts. Those who constantly watch the 4-hour cycle for trading signals are either "pseudo analysts" who make a living by cutting leeks, or retail investors completely swayed by market sentiment.

Why do I say this? Because the true variables influencing Bitcoin's future are hidden within policy undercurrents. Understanding these two lines of insight can save you three years of detours.

My core judgment is this: Bitcoin is entering a "compliance screening period." Short-term price fluctuations are determined by the tightening and loosening of policies in Europe and America, but the long-term value support depends on the formation of global regulatory consensus.

Some may ask, isn't cryptocurrency supposed to be decentralized? Why bring up policies? This argument was valid five years ago, but it’s outdated now. As traditional financial giants like Grayscale and BlackRock enter the market to compete, and more countries introduce regulatory frameworks for crypto assets, Bitcoin is no longer just a toy within the circle; it has become a new species that must be integrated into the global financial system.

Looking at the US spot Bitcoin ETF. When the ETF was approved last year, the market rejoiced for three days before starting to decline. Many people complained, saying "good news is already priced in as bad news." But I said in the community at the time, this was just the beginning. The true significance of ETF approval is that Bitcoin now has a fully compliant mainstream investment channel for the first time. However, compared to the approval event itself, what truly determines the long-term trend is the subsequent capital flow and the evolution of institutional holdings. This is a longer-cycle variable and a key factor in whether Bitcoin can become a standard asset allocation item.
BTC-0,07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureCollectorvip
· 12-27 12:51
The perspective of the policy underlying line indeed hits the mark, but to be honest, most people still can't understand it.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStakingvip
· 12-27 12:49
Policy is the main course, and K-line is just a side dish That's right, those who keep shouting about 70,000 every day should really reflect on themselves.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 12-27 12:44
The policy behind the scenes is quite aggressive, but in the end, we still have to see the Federal Reserve's stance, right?
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 12-27 12:40
Policy games are the main course; K-line is just a distraction. The logic is clear. To be honest, those who ask "Can it break through 70,000" completely lack mechanism design thinking. I also agree with the approval of ETFs; the prelude was well explained. But the key still lies in how to design subsequent incentive compatibility—entry of institutions does not equal consensus locking, and there are enough lessons from history. Decentralization believers are also about to change their tune; GrayScale and BlackRock entered the market and immediately changed their stance. The hypocrisy of decentralization power delegation is quite ironic. I agree with the idea of a compliance screening period, but how will global regulatory consensus be formed? That is the real governance challenge. Retail investors focusing on K-line is indeed a waste of effort; studying policy covert signals is more practical. I've seen through it long ago, so I avoided that wave of "good news realization" for the retail trap. Institutional holdings evolution determines the long-term trend; this game’s equilibrium point has not been fully understood yet, more observation needed.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglassesvip
· 12-27 12:38
Policy is the ultimate factor; the candlestick chart is just noise.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)