#美国探讨BTC作为战略资产的可行性 The United States' Bitcoin strategic reserve plan has recently attracted a lot of attention. As early as March this year, the U.S. government officially signed an executive order to incorporate approximately 210,000 confiscated BTC into the national strategic reserve, which is worth about $18 billion at current prices. However, the market's reaction has not been as enthusiastic as expected.
An interesting shift has occurred: the government has gradually transitioned from being a seller of BTC to a long-term holder. This has indeed reduced large-scale selling pressure in the short term, but BTC prices still hover around $87,000 and have not experienced the anticipated surge.
There are differing opinions on this move. Optimists see it as a long-term positive signal—indicating that Bitcoin is being recognized as a national strategic asset, representing policy-level approval; but some remain cautious, believing that it is currently just passive reserve holding without active accumulation plans, and its actual influence is limited.
What’s more noteworthy is that global interest in sovereign Bitcoin reserves is rising. Countries like France are also beginning to discuss similar schemes, suggesting that a new competitive track is forming. However, compared to that, the U.S. current stance remains quite conservative, with no signs of aggressive expansion measures.
These policy developments remind us that the crypto market's trajectory is not solely dependent on prices; macro policy factors are equally crucial. What do you think? Will the U.S. increase its purchasing power in the near future?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-5854de8b
· 21h ago
To be honest, this thing is just a paper article; when it comes to actual action, we still have to wait. The US government's move is more of a passive response than confidence.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 21h ago
Is government holding coins a good thing? Then why am I still losing... Maybe I just didn't hold the right ones, haha
---
Wait, passive reserves also count as a strategy? That’s really passive.
---
Even buying the dip with 18 billion USD didn’t push the price up, indicating that retail investors really need to reverse their approach this time.
---
I'm reassured by the US being conservative; this way I can continue dollar-cost averaging with losses and maintain steady output.
---
So France is aggressive while the US is conservative. Who will be laughing last... I bet my bottom dollar my buy-the-dip funds will go to zero first.
---
The problem isn’t whether BTC is a strategic asset; the problem is why I always enter at the high points.
---
This round of policy-driven good news feels like "good news is bad news once it’s exhausted." I’ve already gotten used to it.
---
If I really increase my purchases, that would be the end... because it proves all my previous judgments were wrong.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 21h ago
180 billion dollars, in simple terms, just stays there. The real big event depends on when they start buying aggressively.
Holding passively, what's the use? You need to actively buy to make a statement.
France is also jumping into the fun? Haha, this just got interesting.
The US is just too cautious, missing a great opportunity.
Wait... could this eventually turn into a competition among countries for Bitcoin reserves? That would be crazy.
To be honest, including Bitcoin in strategic reserves is just a appetizer; the real signal depends on the subsequent pace of accumulation.
The price has been so calm, which is quite unusual. 87,000 is still pretending to be dead.
Policy recognition is definitely a long-term positive, but in the short term, we might still need to endure.
I just want to know what their actual cost basis is, haha.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 21h ago
Holding $18 billion and not daring to move it, what else are you thinking? This is the US government's tactic.
#美国探讨BTC作为战略资产的可行性 The United States' Bitcoin strategic reserve plan has recently attracted a lot of attention. As early as March this year, the U.S. government officially signed an executive order to incorporate approximately 210,000 confiscated BTC into the national strategic reserve, which is worth about $18 billion at current prices. However, the market's reaction has not been as enthusiastic as expected.
An interesting shift has occurred: the government has gradually transitioned from being a seller of BTC to a long-term holder. This has indeed reduced large-scale selling pressure in the short term, but BTC prices still hover around $87,000 and have not experienced the anticipated surge.
There are differing opinions on this move. Optimists see it as a long-term positive signal—indicating that Bitcoin is being recognized as a national strategic asset, representing policy-level approval; but some remain cautious, believing that it is currently just passive reserve holding without active accumulation plans, and its actual influence is limited.
What’s more noteworthy is that global interest in sovereign Bitcoin reserves is rising. Countries like France are also beginning to discuss similar schemes, suggesting that a new competitive track is forming. However, compared to that, the U.S. current stance remains quite conservative, with no signs of aggressive expansion measures.
These policy developments remind us that the crypto market's trajectory is not solely dependent on prices; macro policy factors are equally crucial. What do you think? Will the U.S. increase its purchasing power in the near future?