2025-12-27 13:10:20

#数字资产市场动态 The 2026 crypto market is brewing a super bull run driven by both liquidity release and technological breakthroughs. The outline is becoming increasingly clear.

Why do I say that? I’ve identified support points across three levels:

**Policy is "Opening the Gates"**
The Federal Reserve’s injections this year have already exceeded 120 billion. This is not just a market rescue measure; fundamentally, it’s paving the way for larger-scale easing policies next year. History teaches us a simple truth—once liquidity is loosened, asset prices will become volatile. This is a cyclical law.

**Technical Aspects Enter a "Nuclear Shift"**
Next year, Ethereum will undergo a critical upgrade, centered on introducing ZK (Zero-Knowledge Proofs). What does this mean? Verification efficiency will be greatly improved, and network throughput could reach the level of 10,000 TPS. By then, Ethereum will truly be capable of supporting massive funds and complex applications. The technical bottleneck will be broken, and the ceiling will be gone.

**Funding is "Whale Inflows"**
Traditional institutions are quietly positioning themselves. The scale of stablecoins and tokenized RWA is expected to approach the trillion-dollar level. If sovereign wealth funds really enter in large numbers, capital inflows could increase by 5 to 10 times. This is no longer a retail market; it’s the beginning of an institutional wave.

**How to participate? My advice is to use both hands:**

Left hand to "stabilize"—gradually allocate to mainstream coins like $BTC and $ETH. This is the fundamental position to benefit from the big trend and cannot be missed.

Right hand to "bet small for big gains"—during the bull market climax, MEME coins and social concepts will wildly harvest emotions. You can use small positions to quietly position yourself in projects with community fermentation potential, observing silently before they become trending topics. The bet is on that explosive trigger.

In the end, the bull market is still a game of cognition and position allocation art. Use mainstream coins to profit from the trend, and use intuition to profit from the frenzy.

ETH0,68%

BTC0,46%

MEME2,7%

RWA0,88%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 10h ago

actually hold up... $1.2T liquidity injection is nice on paper but did you calculate the actual basis point impact on order book depth across major CEXs? because from my backtesting the correlation between fed prints and asset price appreciation breaks down once you factor in slippage costs. just saying.

Reply0

PrivateKeyParanoia

· 10h ago

Left hand BTC, right hand MEME, I've seen through this routine long ago. The key is to catch the right moment to trigger the explosion.

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 11h ago

It sounds very tempting, but can 120 billion really attract whales worth trillions? I feel like this logic is a bit too naive. Wait, after the ZK upgrade, can Ethereum really sustain 10,000 TPS? Historically, such promises have a surprisingly high fulfillment rate. I agree with mainstream coins serving as ballast, but that "keen sense of frenzy" MEME coin segment... are you teaching people to gamble or invest? The institutional wave seems reliable, but I want to know more about when the real entry point will be. Using both hands sounds comfortable, but in reality, it's just the left hand steadily earning while playing PUBG, and the right hand gambling psychologically to harvest oneself.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 11h ago

Oh, this set of logic sounds comfortable, but it still feels like gambling on policy. Will the Federal Reserve really cooperate that much? Holding BTC in one hand and MEME in the other, easy to say, but the real test is when you have to cut losses during actual trading. I'm really looking forward to Ethereum's ZK upgrade, but I'm worried it might be delayed again. The story of institutional entry is well told, but the question is how retail investors can snatch some of the gains from their mouths. A trillion-scale sounds exaggerated; it depends on when the real money will arrive.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 11h ago

Wait, can the Fed's 120 billion trigger a super bull market? I remember that a few years ago, the liquidity injections were even more aggressive. Holding BTC in one hand and MEME coins in the other, sounds easy, but in reality, the seasoned players who cut leeks have already laid out their plans. Ethereum with 10,000 TPS sounds great, but when will it actually be implemented? Instead of guessing about 2026, it's better to focus on the current holdings and not let them drop too much. When whales from institutions enter such a good opportunity, why does it always feel like retail investors are always a step behind?

View OriginalReply0

CoconutWaterBoy

· 11h ago

Damn, here we go again, hyping the 2026 super bull market. Every year it's the same story. The Federal Reserve injecting 120 billion can support the entry of trillion-dollar whales? That doesn't quite add up. ETH upgrade to ZK is indeed a necessity, but the actual implementation will have to wait. Don't just keep dreaming about it. I'll first see if Bitcoin can hold steady; everything else is just floating clouds.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 11h ago

Wait, can 120 billion in funding really drive a super bull market? I've seen too many audit reports; the transmission mechanism of loose policies is far from that straightforward. And Ethereum's ZK upgrade reaching 10,000 TPS? That number warrants a question mark—has formal verification been passed, or is it just another promise in the white paper? MEME coins are lurking in this setup... don't talk about it so confidently. Isn't this just betting on an emotional trigger point? Essentially, it's betting on human vulnerabilities. We need to distinguish—technological breakthroughs are certain, but can the capital and policy sides synchronize? History may not repeat itself.

View OriginalReply0