Volatility in DEX is a common phenomenon; the key lies in whether the system's underlying infrastructure is robust enough.
The USX stablecoin case from Solstice Finance clearly illustrates this point: even during market fluctuations, USX maintained an over 100% on-chain collateralization ratio, liquidity was quickly restored, and the associated eUSX and YieldVault products were unaffected. What does this indicate? It shows that a stablecoin design that prioritizes infrastructure reliability can truly withstand stress tests.
This is also why the industry is increasingly focusing on infrastructure-first stablecoin approaches—not pursuing gimmicks and high yields, but ensuring the system's risk resistance at the foundational level. Only in this way can the DeFi ecosystem endure volatility without breaking apart.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestor
· 15h ago
This is what a true stablecoin should look like—let the data speak for itself without hype or criticism.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 19h ago
That's a valid point. Compared to stablecoins that rely on hype to attract users, it's better to trust those with solid infrastructure. USX's recent performance has indeed been impressive.
View OriginalReply0
Anon4461
· 19h ago
A 100% collateralization ratio sounds too perfect; you need to keep your eyes open and watch carefully.
USX indeed didn't collapse this time, but I still want to wait for a few more cycles before trusting it.
I agree that the infrastructure is reliable, but the real stress test is when a black swan event occurs.
Stablecoins are stable enough, but the ecosystem can still get bottlenecked...
This round, they're again hyping up the infrastructure. Last time it was liquidity, and now?
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractPlumber
· 19h ago
The 100% guarantee ratio depends on how it's calculated in the audit report. Don't be fooled by the numbers. I've seen too many projects boast about being invincible, only to have terrible permission control lapses.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 19h ago
This is what a stablecoin should look like—not constantly boasting about high APY only to go bankrupt after a wave of gains...
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 19h ago
I have to scrutinize the 100% collateral ratio; not all projects dare to be so firm against market fluctuations, which shows that their architecture and design are indeed quite solid.
Volatility in DEX is a common phenomenon; the key lies in whether the system's underlying infrastructure is robust enough.
The USX stablecoin case from Solstice Finance clearly illustrates this point: even during market fluctuations, USX maintained an over 100% on-chain collateralization ratio, liquidity was quickly restored, and the associated eUSX and YieldVault products were unaffected. What does this indicate? It shows that a stablecoin design that prioritizes infrastructure reliability can truly withstand stress tests.
This is also why the industry is increasingly focusing on infrastructure-first stablecoin approaches—not pursuing gimmicks and high yields, but ensuring the system's risk resistance at the foundational level. Only in this way can the DeFi ecosystem endure volatility without breaking apart.