Can we talk about something that feels increasingly controversial, but probably shouldn't be?
Free speech. It's the actual backbone of any real democracy. Not in theory—in practice.
Here's the thing: you can't build a healthy society by micromanaging what people say, cherry-picking which opinions get through, or playing gatekeeper about what ideas are "acceptable" to hear.
That's not freedom. That's just curated control.
When you filter, you decide. When you decide, you limit. And once you start limiting what people can think about, you've already moved past democracy into something else.
It's a principle worth defending—especially in spaces built on the promise of decentralization and open participation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 12-27 13:50
That's right, Web3 should be played this way. No censorship is the true decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 12-27 13:46
That's a good point, but reality is often more complicated... Where exactly is the balance between true freedom and responsibility?
Web3 claims to be decentralized, but what’s the result? Isn’t it just being manipulated by new power structures...
This logic is a bit too idealistic; can complete freedom of speech really guarantee democracy? History has already shown the issues...
I agree with decentralization, but without a basic consensus bottom line, it’s just like anarchy...
So, the crypto world needs to truly practice this philosophy to have credibility; right now, it’s still just harvesting profits from newcomers...
It sounds good, but the question is, who defines what "over-regulation" is and what "should be regulated"... That’s inherently very difficult...
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 12-27 13:43
Exactly right, Web3 should have this flavor; otherwise, what's the difference from centralized platforms?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 12-27 13:29
Well said, but in reality, there are very few platforms that truly open up.
This logic applied to Web3 is ironic—decentralization is loudly proclaimed, but governance still involves censorship.
Can we talk about something that feels increasingly controversial, but probably shouldn't be?
Free speech. It's the actual backbone of any real democracy. Not in theory—in practice.
Here's the thing: you can't build a healthy society by micromanaging what people say, cherry-picking which opinions get through, or playing gatekeeper about what ideas are "acceptable" to hear.
That's not freedom. That's just curated control.
When you filter, you decide. When you decide, you limit. And once you start limiting what people can think about, you've already moved past democracy into something else.
It's a principle worth defending—especially in spaces built on the promise of decentralization and open participation.