In the fast-paced battlefield of the crypto world, simply surviving is already a victory.
Looking back at the project inventory of recent years, only a few can last a year, and even fewer can maintain an autonomous community for more than a year. But a closer look reveals that those names with a stable market position today—DOGE, SHIB, WIF, PEPE, POPCAT—are all tested by the passage of time.
The logic behind this is simple: in the short term, rely on hot topics; in the medium term, rely on luck; in the long term, what matters? Whether the community can truly operate autonomously, and whether the project can withstand multiple market cycle reshuffles. It might be popular for a month, hard to sustain for a year, and even more so for two years. That’s no longer just about hype.
The sustainability of community autonomy is often overlooked, yet it is a key indicator distinguishing speculative projects from ecological ones. When a community can operate spontaneously for over 21 months without continuous funding or backing from big influencers, it tells a story—not about token price, but about resilience.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Web3ExplorerLin
· 19h ago
Hypothesis: the survivorship bias here is *chef's kiss*—we're only seeing the winners, right? but interestingly enough, what separates DOGE from the thousand corpses is less about tokenomics and more about whether the community actually *believes* it's decentralized. it's like an oracle network but for collective delusion, and honestly? that's the most honest thing in crypto rn ngl
Reply0
orphaned_block
· 19h ago
This is the real truth. Dead projects die quickly, and only those with real value survive.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 19h ago
It has proven that community governance lasting over 21 months is the real indicator. Previously, we tested the on-chain activity data of several meme coins, and indeed, those that survived all have unique protocol architectures supporting them.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 19h ago
Really, projects that can survive more than two years are tough, most of the crypto world is just fleeting.
I heard that some have no funding and no big V endorsements, relying solely on the community's self-motivation—that's true skill.
How did DOGE get through it? Tell us!
View OriginalReply0
HappyToBeDumped
· 19h ago
Really, projects that have survived for two years are worth respect, regardless of whether they go up or not.
In the fast-paced battlefield of the crypto world, simply surviving is already a victory.
Looking back at the project inventory of recent years, only a few can last a year, and even fewer can maintain an autonomous community for more than a year. But a closer look reveals that those names with a stable market position today—DOGE, SHIB, WIF, PEPE, POPCAT—are all tested by the passage of time.
The logic behind this is simple: in the short term, rely on hot topics; in the medium term, rely on luck; in the long term, what matters? Whether the community can truly operate autonomously, and whether the project can withstand multiple market cycle reshuffles. It might be popular for a month, hard to sustain for a year, and even more so for two years. That’s no longer just about hype.
The sustainability of community autonomy is often overlooked, yet it is a key indicator distinguishing speculative projects from ecological ones. When a community can operate spontaneously for over 21 months without continuous funding or backing from big influencers, it tells a story—not about token price, but about resilience.
Time will sift out what truly has vitality.