Midnight phone vibration, XRP ledger anomaly alert flashing—here we go again. But this time, the story is much more interesting than expected.
Having been involved in the crypto space for years, I’ve seen countless chain reactions triggered by small code bugs. The "automatic runaway" drama played out on the XRP ledger last night has become a textbook case: a major custodial service’s automation system, after draining the XRP balance of a related wallet, continued to wildly create new accounts. In just a few hours, nearly 11,000 invalid transaction requests were sent to the XRP network.
This isn’t a hacking incident. Frankly, it’s a complete automation script out of control.
**From Normal Process to Infinite Loop**
The story is simple. The custodian’s account creation script generates XRP wallets for users according to a set logic. The system originally ran quite stably. The problem lies in one step: the logic that checks the balance after it’s been drained.
The XRP ledger has a design mechanism—each new account must lock at least 20 XRP as a reserve, and each transaction destroys 0.0004 XRP. This is to prevent bad actors from creating大量垃圾账户 and overwhelming the network.
Theoretically, when the custodian’s XRP balance runs out, the script should stop working. But what actually happened? The system fell into a dead loop. It didn’t stop; instead, it kept sending high-frequency account creation requests.
This automated runaway event turned the "protective mechanism" itself into a source of pressure. It reminds everyone of a simple truth: no matter how smart the code, it must have corresponding circuit breakers and manual intervention mechanisms. Even a reliable major custodian, if its automation logic has gaps, could cause consequences that affect the entire blockchain.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartMoneyWallet
· 18h ago
11,000 invalid requests? How poorly is this guy's protection logic designed... Even the top custodians are like this, what can retail investors still believe in?
No wonder big institutions are always the ones getting into trouble. The on-chain data reveals the truth immediately. The excuse of automated scripts going out of control is so outdated.
No circuit breaker? Isn't that playing with fire? It's only a matter of time before it affects the public chain.
Are we really relying on manual intervention? Ha... Wake up, everyone.
By the way, during those 11,000 spam transactions, did anyone pay attention to the whale's fund flow? This matter isn't that simple.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 18h ago
That's why I never trust full automation; even the smartest code can't withstand a logical loophole.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 18h ago
Code out of control is scarier than hackers; how embarrassing is that?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 18h ago
This is again an automation issue; a circuit breaker mechanism should have been implemented long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 18h ago
Is this another basic bug? Even the head custodians can mess up, hilarious.
---
Automated script going out of control is a common occurrence; what’s truly terrifying is the lack of circuit breakers.
---
So, no matter how awesome the code is, someone still needs to watch over it; you can't trust machines completely.
---
11,000 spam transactions. If it were a hacker, they would have been caught long ago. But code bugs are the hardest to defend against.
---
Still dare to call yourself a top-tier? Your protection mechanisms are not even in place.
---
Receiving an alert in the middle of the night should be familiar, but this time it’s truly outrageous—the script broke itself.
---
Looks like I need to add a stop-loss mechanism; otherwise, a single logical error could crash the entire chain, which is too dangerous.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 18h ago
Here we go again, the code for the leading service providers is also doing the same? Looks like no one can escape the spell of automation.
Midnight phone vibration, XRP ledger anomaly alert flashing—here we go again. But this time, the story is much more interesting than expected.
Having been involved in the crypto space for years, I’ve seen countless chain reactions triggered by small code bugs. The "automatic runaway" drama played out on the XRP ledger last night has become a textbook case: a major custodial service’s automation system, after draining the XRP balance of a related wallet, continued to wildly create new accounts. In just a few hours, nearly 11,000 invalid transaction requests were sent to the XRP network.
This isn’t a hacking incident. Frankly, it’s a complete automation script out of control.
**From Normal Process to Infinite Loop**
The story is simple. The custodian’s account creation script generates XRP wallets for users according to a set logic. The system originally ran quite stably. The problem lies in one step: the logic that checks the balance after it’s been drained.
The XRP ledger has a design mechanism—each new account must lock at least 20 XRP as a reserve, and each transaction destroys 0.0004 XRP. This is to prevent bad actors from creating大量垃圾账户 and overwhelming the network.
Theoretically, when the custodian’s XRP balance runs out, the script should stop working. But what actually happened? The system fell into a dead loop. It didn’t stop; instead, it kept sending high-frequency account creation requests.
This automated runaway event turned the "protective mechanism" itself into a source of pressure. It reminds everyone of a simple truth: no matter how smart the code, it must have corresponding circuit breakers and manual intervention mechanisms. Even a reliable major custodian, if its automation logic has gaps, could cause consequences that affect the entire blockchain.