2025-12-27 15:21:58

Our long and short data product has been online for just half a month, and the response has been beyond expectations. So far, 263 users have participated in the experience, including 21 official applications, with a single service fee reaching the $100,000 level. Interestingly, the profiles of these trial users are quite consistent—they are either industry peers, seasoned large traders, or professional technical teams.

Recently, I saw someone in the comment section questioning the value of our data. To be honest, such voices are hard to pay attention to. Why? The user base and quality determine everything. Our existing users have a significant advantage in trading ability—they execute strategies, control risks, and respond to the market at a completely different level. In our words, it's the difference between driving and walking.

Based on this situation, we have adjusted our operational strategy. New users who want to join need to meet certain entry thresholds. This is not about setting barriers but about maintaining the quality of the community. After all, only high-quality user samples can support truly meaningful data value.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SelfMadeRuggee

· 14h ago

$100,000 at once? How long do I need to hold U to be able to play? Just half a month and the response is this, there really is something there. Setting an access threshold sounds nice, but isn't it just to keep the big investors' money? Can these data really hold up, or is it just another way to harvest the little guys? I understand that old users have an advantage, but do newcomers never have a chance?

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 15h ago

I think this logic is a bit turning around... In the early stages, it relied on big players to support the scene, and now it’s setting thresholds in return? Isn’t this just complaining that retail investors are lowering the average line?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 15h ago

Half a month, 263 users, 21 official applications? This conversion rate... is impressive. A service fee of $100,000, do big clients really pay? It depends on the actual data. I understand setting thresholds, but don't make it look like private domain harvesting; it has to rely on the strength of the product itself.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 15h ago

Haha, 263 trial users and 21 paying users. The conversion rate... The polite way to say it is "filtering high-quality users," but to me it sounds more like "initial pump in a Ponzi scheme." If setting a threshold isn't called a barrier, then chopping leeks is also called "community optimization."

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 15h ago

Half a month, 263 trial users and 21 official applications. The conversion rate is pretty good. I understand setting a threshold to maintain quality, but essentially it's still about filtering people. $100,000 per deal? Let's see if it can consistently outperform the market first. I've heard too many analogies about driving and walking, but in the end, it's all about the returns.

View OriginalReply0