2025-12-27 15:24:17

The repricing cycle is kicking in. BLIND stands out with superior technology architecture—zero KYC requirements paired with full functionality makes it genuinely different from most projects in this space. Meanwhile, AVICI just crossed the 100M milestone. The momentum in the Blindfold ecosystem is real, and we're likely just seeing the early phases of this rally. 🚀 The combination of practical utility and community adoption is creating solid fundamentals for price appreciation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShibaSunglasses

· 8h ago

ngl BLIND's architecture is truly top-notch. No KYC and still running full features? That's quite rare in the crypto world... AVICI has broken the million mark, right? It feels like this wave has truly arrived.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 8h ago

Zero KYC is indeed a strong point, but there are very few projects that can actually be used. BLIND will only be meaningful if it can hold onto this advantage.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 8h ago

Zero KYC with a complete set of features depends on what on-chain data says. 100M is just a vanity metric; the real key is trading depth and slippage control. In the early stages, it's easy to be carried away by narratives. I am more concerned about how efficient the capital is and how large the arbitrage opportunities are.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 8h ago

ngl, this zero KYC design is really impressive, but do so many people actually care about privacy...

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 8h ago

Zero KYC is truly awesome. This is what Web3 should look like. I don't understand why those projects are still messing around with reviews.

View OriginalReply0

DAOplomacy

· 8h ago

honestly the zero kyc angle is interesting but like... has anyone actually stress-tested the non-trivial externalities here? historical precedent suggests these "genuinely different" narratives tend to have path dependency issues we don't see until later. not saying it's bad, just arguing the stakeholder alignment incentives feel sub-optimal for actual long-term adoption, tbh.

Reply0