2025-12-27 15:24:59

Speech should be free—yet the fine print tells a different story. The Digital Services Act comes with conditions, restrictions, and clauses that reshape what "freedom" actually means in the digital age.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TooScaredToSell

· 3h ago

That thing called DSA, to put it simply, is just putting a straitjacket on freedom. It sounds fancy, but it's basically just a name change for regulation.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 5h ago

Listen, about freedom of speech... Saying nice things with your mouth, but when you turn around, there are a bunch of rules. It's really just a joke, isn't it?

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 16h ago

Upon closer inspection of the terms, you realize that freedom is not so simple... Those rules and regulations of DSA, to put it plainly, mean that the right to define freedom has been taken away again.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 16h ago

Another set of excuses... Under the guise of freedom, it's all just terms and conditions, ironic.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaBrain

· 16h ago

This is a typical case of "freedom" talk, all nice words, but upon closer inspection, it's all just a scheme.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 16h ago

Hmm... The rhetoric of free speech sounds good, but once you look at the regulatory clauses, it's a different story. The DSA is basically redefining what "freedom" really means.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 16h ago

The devil is in the details of free speech... The promised freedom, but as soon as DSA comes out, it's all rules and restrictions. This is probably why Web3 needs to build its own ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 17h ago

Freedom, my ass. A bunch of terms and conditions. Is this what they call freedom of speech?

View OriginalReply0