2025-12-27 15:25:27

This afternoon at 5:00 PM, my trading monitoring system detected trading signals for the three cryptocurrencies DASH, ZEN, and ZEC. The system has a scoring mechanism that automatically assigns a score to each signal.

The scoring range is from -4 to 7. A key setting here is that the monitor defaults to only display signals with a score above 1, which helps filter out most noise and false signals, improving the signal-to-noise ratio. The numbers seen on the screen are the real-time scoring results.

This mechanism has been in operation for some time. Although not 100% accurate, it still helps in filtering effective trading opportunities. Recently, DASH, ZEN, and ZEC have shown different characteristics; those interested can follow up and observe on their own.

DASH10,72%

ZEC10,11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTArchaeologis

· 15h ago

The concept of signal-to-noise ratio is actually borrowed from early data art, which is interesting. However, no matter how smart the system is, it can only be a tool; ultimately, it still depends on human judgment.

View OriginalReply0

RektDetective

· 15h ago

It sounds like you're selling systems again. With such a high signal-to-noise ratio, why haven't you made a fortune yet? --- DASH, ZEN, ZEC? Do these three coins really have signals recently, or is it just machine hallucination? --- If it's above 1 point, it shows; do you filter out those from -4 to 0 points? Feels a bit too optimistic. --- The automatic scoring mechanism sounds good, but I just want to ask, what is the actual accuracy rate? --- How long has this system been running? Can I see the win rate? --- It seems every time people say there's a system with signals, but in the end, it's still luck-based gambling. --- That coin ZEC isn't hot anymore, so why bother following it?

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 15h ago

According to research, the signal filtering mechanism's approach to optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio is indeed feasible, but it is worth noting whether the 1-point threshold setting has been statistically validated. From a technical perspective, the score range from -4 to 7 implies a hidden assumption—that the volatility characteristics of each cryptocurrency are the same. This may need to be re-evaluated in practical operations. By the way, the simultaneous appearance of privacy coins DASH, ZEN, and ZEC—what is the underlying logic? Is it technical correlation or market resonance? I'm a bit curious.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 15h ago

Wow, only shows above 1 point? The filtering is pretty good. --- Is the system scoring reliable, or is it just another cycle of losing money? --- DASH, ZEN, ZEC three together, is this an all-in move, brother? --- The concept of signal-to-noise ratio is pretty good, but is it really accurate in practice? --- Feels like there's too much trust in the algorithm, be careful of being cut. --- This mechanism has been around for so long, can it really make money, honestly? --- Suddenly three signals appear at the same time, is it a concentrated outbreak or just a coincidence? --- The design of the -4 to 7 point range is quite interesting, how is it calculated? --- Only looking at above 1 point, are everything from 0 to 1 points trash? --- Another old coin like DASH, when will it turn around? --- Is this scoring system really better than manually analyzing the charts?

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 15h ago

The system scoring mechanism is good, but I want to ask how the actual win rate is?

View OriginalReply0