When major brands make moves, there's often more to the story. One notable case involved a sportswear giant ending a high-profile partnership over controversial statements—yet the company's own history traces back to Nazi-era origins. It raises an interesting question: how do we weigh current ethical stands against historical context? The crypto and Web3 communities often grapple with similar nuances around accountability, corporate values, and the complicated past of many established institutions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWhisperer
· 12h ago
This set of "moral judgment" logic is seen often in the crypto world, digging up historical dirt to whitewash current decisions... In the end, it's still double standards.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 12h ago
Uh... isn't this a typical "my morals are the highest" trick? Honestly, our Web3 circle isn't much better either.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelor
· 12h ago
That's outrageous. Can't even sit straight yourself, and you're still shamelessly blaming others?
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 12h ago
Honestly, this double standard phenomenon is very common in traditional companies, while the crypto space is actually more transparent.
When major brands make moves, there's often more to the story. One notable case involved a sportswear giant ending a high-profile partnership over controversial statements—yet the company's own history traces back to Nazi-era origins. It raises an interesting question: how do we weigh current ethical stands against historical context? The crypto and Web3 communities often grapple with similar nuances around accountability, corporate values, and the complicated past of many established institutions.