Interestingly, even though a leading exchange experienced staff turnover this year, its user experience reputation remains among the top.
What’s more worth noting is the ecosystem incentive strategy. Hyperliquid, which laid off engineers early last year, surprisingly unlocked about $4 million worth of HYPE tokens afterward. From another perspective, Aave’s founder pocketed the frontend revenue.
This contrast is quite striking—within the same Web3 world, the differences in incentive mechanisms are so significant. Some rely on community consensus to share wealth, while others go their separate ways. This perhaps reflects differing perceptions of long-term development among various projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWitch
· 8h ago
ngl the hyperliquid move hits different... $4m for a fired engineer? that's literally alchemy most protocols could never. meanwhile aave's founder playing the peasant game, hoarding frontend fees like it's a cursed LP position waiting to liquidate lmao
Reply0
DuskSurfer
· 8h ago
This incentive difference is truly amazing; Hyperliquid's gameplay really understands people's hearts better.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 8h ago
The difference in this incentive mechanism really shows the project's scope, right? I need to ponder the strategy behind Hyperliquid a bit more.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 8h ago
Oops, Hyperliquid's move is really clever, you get paid even after solving it
Aave's founder's move is truly competitive, just hoarding the benefits for themselves
The same Web3, but the character differences are so big?
This is the real divergence of values, not just bragging
Looks like I need to stay close to projects that genuinely care about the community
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 8h ago
Bro, Hyperliquid's move is really amazing. Even after being laid off, they still get to keep 4 million tokens. Now that's true Web3 spirit.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 8h ago
The medical record shows that Hyperliquid's incentive structure really resembles progressive treatment — engineers who were laid off still received 4 million, indicating that the token distribution's health assessment report is indeed passing. In contrast, on the Aave side, frontend revenue directly goes into private pockets, which warrants a risk warning. The clinical performance doesn't look very optimistic.
Interestingly, even though a leading exchange experienced staff turnover this year, its user experience reputation remains among the top.
What’s more worth noting is the ecosystem incentive strategy. Hyperliquid, which laid off engineers early last year, surprisingly unlocked about $4 million worth of HYPE tokens afterward. From another perspective, Aave’s founder pocketed the frontend revenue.
This contrast is quite striking—within the same Web3 world, the differences in incentive mechanisms are so significant. Some rely on community consensus to share wealth, while others go their separate ways. This perhaps reflects differing perceptions of long-term development among various projects.