The Bitcoin protocol layer is experiencing a wave of in-depth discussions on quantum-safe technologies in 2025. Community developers have proposed multiple practical and feasible signature verification schemes to address potential future quantum threats.
Among them, the most noteworthy is the Winternitz signature construction scheme based on the OP_CAT instruction—by introducing corresponding capabilities at the script level, it can achieve quantum resistance without disrupting the existing architecture. The cleverness of this design lies in fully utilizing Bitcoin's current tools, avoiding disruptive low-level changes.
Another research direction involves introducing the STARK proof system. Compared to traditional schemes, STARKs do not rely on trusted setups and offer greater reliability in cryptography. However, efficiently integrating such advanced verification schemes within Bitcoin's limited computational resources remains a challenge for technical teams.
Overall, the Bitcoin community is making thorough preparations for long-term protocol security. Although these cutting-edge quantum-safe solutions are still in the theoretical stage, they represent a rational attitude towards blockchain infrastructure—being proactive and ensuring the protocol remains sufficiently resilient.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektButStillHere
· 16h ago
Still talking about rehashing old topics, how many years have we been hearing about quantum threats
Can OP_CAT really work? Feels more like a PPT proposal
Are these developers trying to make a move or are they genuinely afraid of quantum brute force attacks
STARK sounds impressive, but can the computing power handle it
Let's wait and see; in the short term, quantum threats are not imminent
Does Bitcoin really need to worry about this? Seems like unnecessary worry
Preparing in advance sounds good, but I just want to see if it can actually go live
Stop boasting about the theoretical stage; only talk when there are practical solutions
This is the real core work, much more meaningful than just discussing coin prices
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 16h ago
Well, OP_CAT really thought this through. It doesn't break the existing architecture and can resist quantum attacks. I have to give a thumbs up for this idea.
Quantum threats are still a few years away from truly arriving, but it's never too early to prepare.
STARK sounds advanced, but the resource consumption is a bit apologetic. That's Bitcoin's biggest obstacle.
The phrase "prepare for a rainy day" perfectly describes the current state of BTC developers—steady.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourer
· 17h ago
OP_CAT is truly unbeatable. Without changing the underlying layer, it can add quantum protection. This is the way Bitcoin should be.
The Bitcoin protocol layer is experiencing a wave of in-depth discussions on quantum-safe technologies in 2025. Community developers have proposed multiple practical and feasible signature verification schemes to address potential future quantum threats.
Among them, the most noteworthy is the Winternitz signature construction scheme based on the OP_CAT instruction—by introducing corresponding capabilities at the script level, it can achieve quantum resistance without disrupting the existing architecture. The cleverness of this design lies in fully utilizing Bitcoin's current tools, avoiding disruptive low-level changes.
Another research direction involves introducing the STARK proof system. Compared to traditional schemes, STARKs do not rely on trusted setups and offer greater reliability in cryptography. However, efficiently integrating such advanced verification schemes within Bitcoin's limited computational resources remains a challenge for technical teams.
Overall, the Bitcoin community is making thorough preparations for long-term protocol security. Although these cutting-edge quantum-safe solutions are still in the theoretical stage, they represent a rational attitude towards blockchain infrastructure—being proactive and ensuring the protocol remains sufficiently resilient.