AI agents need transparency—how do you know they're doing what they claim? On-chain verification is the answer.
Warden Protocol is pioneering an AI-native blockchain where agents publish their actions directly, and applications can validate those results using spex (statistical proof of execution). This bridges the trust gap between AI decision-making and blockchain verification.
The mainnet is currently running in limited access mode, gradually rolling out to early participants. It's a compelling approach to making AI behavior auditable and verifiable at the protocol level.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractFreelancer
· 7h ago
The spex verification mechanism sounds good, but can it really prevent AI from doing evil? Or is it just another seemingly awesome solution?
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 7h ago
ngl this is exactly what I've been wanting to see, AI black box operations really need to be regulated
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 8h ago
Sounds pretty ideal, but is spex really reliable... I always feel it's just another hype.
AI agents need transparency—how do you know they're doing what they claim? On-chain verification is the answer.
Warden Protocol is pioneering an AI-native blockchain where agents publish their actions directly, and applications can validate those results using spex (statistical proof of execution). This bridges the trust gap between AI decision-making and blockchain verification.
The mainnet is currently running in limited access mode, gradually rolling out to early participants. It's a compelling approach to making AI behavior auditable and verifiable at the protocol level.