2025-12-28 14:22:42

Tired of frequently encountering performance bottlenecks when trading on L2 networks?

SEI's built-in L1 blockchain adopts a brand-new architectural approach, providing each application with performance guarantees similar to those of exchanges. The parallel EVM engine, combined with sub-400ms finality time, creates a completely different technical realm.

This execution layer solution is exactly the infrastructure needed for the next wave of high-frequency DeFi—supporting the synchronized execution of complex trading logic and eliminating the bottlenecks of traditional L1 in concurrent processing. The entire process from order arrival, execution, to settlement is completed with near real-time latency, opening up new possibilities for strategic traders.

SEI's tech stack may be redefining the performance ceiling of public chains.

SEI-3,53%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

airdrop_whisperer

· 2025-12-31 13:56

400ms is indeed tempting, but these guys always hype it up extravagantly. Once it's actually launched, it's a whole different story.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 2025-12-30 13:35

actually if you read the sei whitepaper... those vesting unlocks start in q2 and suddenly everyone forgets about sub-400ms when the token dump begins lol

Reply0

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 2025-12-30 07:06

Oh wow, those ghostly delays on L2 can really drive people crazy... If SEI can truly achieve within 400ms, traders will probably flood in madly. What can you do in 400ms? The dream of robot arbitrage... But honestly, I want to see how it performs in real operation, not just theoretical discussions. The parallel EVM idea is interesting; it seems much more reliable than those patchwork solutions. Breaking the ceiling is great. Anyway, I go all-in on Monday and cry on Friday. The lower the latency, the faster the losses, haha. If the performance is really top-notch, can the gas fees be cheaper... That's what I care about most.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFatigue

· 2025-12-28 14:52

Selling L1 again, this time switching to SEI? Honestly, 400ms sounds pretty good, but I just want to ask if it will be another story after the mainnet goes live.

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 2025-12-28 14:48

Sub-400ms sounds good, but can it really run? Let's see if it can withstand a real large transaction first.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 2025-12-28 14:48

Honestly, the L2 stuff has become pretty stale. Gas fees often skyrocket, and transactions have to wait forever. SEI's parallel EVM approach does have some real features; a 400ms finality time on-chain is indeed impressive. But hype aside, whether it can truly support high-frequency trading depends on real-world performance. Many projects have claimed to "redefine performance," only to be taught a lesson by the market in the end. If SEI can really deliver, we can talk again. Wait, how does this architecture handle MEV protection? Parallel execution often introduces a bunch of new front-running issues. If not handled properly, it's all for nothing.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeTrustFund

· 2025-12-28 14:38

Sounds impressive, but can SEI really maintain this performance? Could it end up being just another project that gets hyped up and then underdelivers?

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 2025-12-28 14:33

Really? The number sub400ms sounds impressive, but L2 has been hyped about this for a long time...

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBuffet

· 2025-12-28 14:30

Still boasting about exchange-level speed with 400ms? Real exchanges have been millisecond-level for a long time. This kind of promotion is a bit exaggerated.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 2025-12-28 14:28

Oh no, the latency on L2 is really annoying. SEI's sub-400ms sounds promising. Finally, someone is building exchange-level performance, no more being tortured by L2. By the way, can parallel EVM truly solve concurrency issues, or is it just hype? This time feels different. If real-time settlement can be achieved, high-frequency trading could really showcase some tricks. SEI is interesting, but we need to see real data to judge. Another promise of "redefining the performance ceiling," I've seen too many such claims. But on the other hand, this architectural approach is definitely worth paying attention to. Hmm, a 400ms finality time feels like worth trying out. L1s will ultimately have to compete at this performance level, unavoidable.

View OriginalReply0