2025-12-30 17:26:14

Trading is really a dilemma. Full-time monitoring consumes a lot of physical and mental energy, and you may not make money in the end. Part-time trading, on the other hand, often leads to distraction and missing market opportunities. The market, however, operates 24/7—Asia wakes up, Europe comes online, Europe sleeps, and America rises again. There’s always a time when you’re dozing off.

Many people are asking themselves the same question: why do I always earn less than I lose? A harsh truth is—you are competing against institutional opponents with millisecond-level computing power and team support. Their trading system response speed, data processing ability, and risk management models are not something manual trading can match. Individual retail traders respond in seconds, while institutions respond in milliseconds.

More and more traders are realizing that instead of wasting time and energy, it’s better to let algorithmic trading systems capture those repetitive opportunities. Quantitative trading strategies can eliminate the influence of human weaknesses, executing according to predetermined rules, and won’t change decisions impulsively due to greed or fear. Every market fluctuation is monitored; while you sleep, the system is working. That’s true fair competition.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MaticHoleFiller

· 2025-12-31 12:54

Speaking of which, manual trading is really a race against time—exhausting and still not making money. Quantitative trading is the way out; institutions are using millisecond-level speed, and we're comparing with seconds? Basically, the human brain can't compete with algorithms. Instead of watching the market all day, it's better to let a bot stay up and help you.

View OriginalReply0

wagmi_eventually

· 2025-12-30 20:24

In simple terms, manual trading is a life-and-death gamble for money, exhausting and unprofitable. --- Institutions react in milliseconds, while we operate in seconds. This is not competition; it's like being cut down like vegetables. --- Quantitative trading is really attractive. I'm also thinking about developing an algorithmic system to try. --- Watching the market 24/7 is indeed exhausting; it's better to sleep and let a bot help me earn. --- Retail traders can't compete with robots, no matter how hard they try. That's the reality. --- Instead of staying up all night watching the market, it's better to find a reliable quantitative strategy. --- Milliseconds versus seconds, we're already at a disadvantage right from the start. --- Thinking back to my full-time trading days, I really lost a lot; now I'm considering moving into quantitative trading. --- Human weaknesses are so true—when nervous, we make reckless moves. --- So in the end, it still comes down to algorithms; manual trading really has no solution.

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 2025-12-30 19:27

Basically, retail investors are just being crushed by the market. I'm also considering whether to get into quantitative trading, but it feels like a new trick to get cut again...

View OriginalReply0

FreeMinter

· 2025-12-30 17:55

That's right, manual operation is really just playing with robots, you can't win at all. --- Milliseconds versus seconds, how can you compare? Isn't this just a blow to the dimension? --- I just want to ask, can quantitative trading really help retail investors turn things around, or do they just lose money in a different way? --- Monitoring the market 24 hours? I choose to lie down and let the bot stay up all night. --- Instead of stressing over so much, it's better to figure out early whether you're the chosen one or just a chives. --- Institutions have milliseconds, I have naps, a perfect balance. --- This article hit the mark, I feel like I'm boxing against an invisible opponent. --- Algorithms don't sleep, but I have to sleep too. What to do? Should I also become a robot? --- If you can't beat them, admit defeat. Finding a reliable quantitative tool is the way to go. --- It sounds wonderful, but how many actually make money? Most are still paying tuition fees.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 2025-12-30 17:55

Milliseconds to seconds, this gap can't be made up by effort, give me a break.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 2025-12-30 17:55

That's right, seconds vs milliseconds, we simply can't compete with their machines.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 2025-12-30 17:50

That really hits close to home... I'm the kind of person who sleeps through the market movements, and when I wake up, it's fallen again. Damn time difference.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleInTraining

· 2025-12-30 17:49

In plain terms, it's the fate of being wiped out by institutions; quantification is the right path.

View OriginalReply0

down_only_larry

· 2025-12-30 17:39

That's right, manual trading is just a battle of patience with oneself; in the end, the machine always wins.

View OriginalReply0

BTCWaveRider

· 2025-12-30 17:29

The difference between seconds and milliseconds is the gap between us and the institutions...