Imagine the blockchain as a skyscraper built on the cloud. Oracles are the level rulers that calibrate whether it’s straight. Once the level is tilted, no matter how luxurious the decoration, it can’t be saved — collapse will come sooner or later. In the winter of 2025, the BTCFi ecosystem will explode, and the industry no longer asks "Can this project run smoothly?" Now the focus is on "Can the underlying logic withstand the test?"

The key question is: why trust a certain oracle project? Frankly, this is a false proposition. What you truly rely on is not the project team’s promises, but that set of things that will never betray humanity — mathematics.

In traditional Web3, oracles are often understood as "information carriers." But the new generation of solutions takes a different path, becoming a "truth filter." The reality is that most oracles face the same dilemma: trust is constantly being diluted. You have to believe that nodes won’t act maliciously, trust that multi-signatures have no vulnerabilities, trust that the quotes from centralized exchanges haven’t been maliciously manipulated. These assumptions stack up, and the risks multiply. The real innovation lies in using game theory — through rigorous mathematical models — to completely eliminate "human trust" and replace it with "the cost of malicious behavior." This is the fundamental difference.

From a technical perspective, what’s most impressive is the deep integration with the BTC ecosystem. Today, Bitcoin’s Layer 2 has spread like capillaries, and the new solution elegantly solves the data feeding problem caused by Bitcoin’s non-Turing completeness through innovative techniques like light client verification and state root synchronization. This is no longer just about moving data back and forth.