#数字资产动态追踪 transactions never talk about "mutual benefit and win-win," they are about wealth redistribution.
Discussions in the crypto circle always like to frame it as a "technological revolution."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoGovernanceOfficer
· 01-06 09:25
ngl, the "tech revolution" framing is just decentralization theater. empirically speaking, most token distributions still follow winner-take-most mechanics. data suggests early holders capture 80%+ of value gains regardless of governance structures we slap on top. fascinating how we pretend voting tokens solve this.
Reply0
LightningLady
· 01-06 00:07
Haha, you're so right. Don't pretend to be noble when it comes to cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 01-06 00:03
Basically, it's a zero-sum game; whoever has more chips wins.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-06 00:03
There's nothing wrong with that; "mutual benefit and win-win" is just a brainwashing phrase for retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLord
· 01-05 23:47
That was pretty harsh, but honestly... the rhetoric in the crypto world has gotten so repetitive that my ears are starting to get calluses.
#数字资产动态追踪 transactions never talk about "mutual benefit and win-win," they are about wealth redistribution.
Discussions in the crypto circle always like to frame it as a "technological revolution."