I recently came across the EU's new regulation set to take effect in February 2027, requiring smartphones with removable batteries. It suddenly struck me how this logic intersects with the crypto world.
First, let's go over the details: Starting in 2027, mobile phones and tablets sold in Europe must allow users to safely replace their batteries themselves. Instruction manuals must be permanently available, and manufacturers must guarantee spare parts availability for at least five years at reasonable prices. Apple is already designing removable back covers, so this isn't a choice but a mandatory requirement.
But what's truly interesting is the underlying logic clash. There's an old saying in the crypto market: "History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes." This new battery regulation is essentially a battle for user control—similar to what the crypto world learned from Mt.Gox's collapse: "If you don't control your private keys, your assets aren't truly yours." The consumer electronics industry is heading down the same path: when you can't replace the battery, the device's lifespan is in the hands of the manufacturer. You think you're buying a product, but in reality, you're just leasing it long-term.
In recent years, self-custody has seen a resurgence in crypto, accelerated by FTX's collapse. A lot of funds are flowing back into hardware wallets and self-managed solutions, driven by one core idea: take back control. Now, consumer electronics are experiencing the same awakening—users realize they have no say over even the most basic device functions and are starting to push back. The right to replace a battery may seem trivial, but it embodies the core demand: "My device, my rules."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 01-09 17:21
Wow, this angle is amazing. The essence of control is indeed connected.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 01-09 00:51
Wow, that's a perfect analogy. Apple being forced to open up the battery is just like exchanges being forced to be transparent—both are being pushed.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-08 10:59
History is like this, always rhyming. If you can't hold your private key, your assets will go down the drain; if you can't disassemble the device, you'll be kept in captivity... Essentially, they're all the same, just a transfer of power. Seemingly two circles, but actually playing the same act.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-08 00:07
Wow, this analogy is brilliant. Battery freedom is like digital asset freedom. Apple should be crying.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 01-06 17:54
Wow, this is spot on. The essence of control is exactly like this.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-06 17:52
Amazing, this logic is really brilliant. The EU's move is helping consumers regain their voice.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 01-06 17:49
Brilliant, the EU's move directly hits the capitalists where it hurts.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 01-06 17:44
Saw this news at 2 AM and immediately did some calculations... The EU's move is essentially forcing a reduction in hardware lock-in periods, from an average of 6-8 years down to having to open within 5 years... By the way, this logic is indeed similar to the self-custody wave, both are about competing for control over liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 01-06 17:31
Wow, this analogy is brilliant. Phone batteries are like digital asset batteries—being squeezed by manufacturers or having accounts frozen by exchanges is the same logic.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWang
· 01-06 17:27
Wow, the EU this time really outdid themselves. It feels like our crypto industry's lessons have been forcibly transferred to mobile phone batteries. Haha, a bit scary.
I recently came across the EU's new regulation set to take effect in February 2027, requiring smartphones with removable batteries. It suddenly struck me how this logic intersects with the crypto world.
First, let's go over the details: Starting in 2027, mobile phones and tablets sold in Europe must allow users to safely replace their batteries themselves. Instruction manuals must be permanently available, and manufacturers must guarantee spare parts availability for at least five years at reasonable prices. Apple is already designing removable back covers, so this isn't a choice but a mandatory requirement.
But what's truly interesting is the underlying logic clash. There's an old saying in the crypto market: "History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes." This new battery regulation is essentially a battle for user control—similar to what the crypto world learned from Mt.Gox's collapse: "If you don't control your private keys, your assets aren't truly yours." The consumer electronics industry is heading down the same path: when you can't replace the battery, the device's lifespan is in the hands of the manufacturer. You think you're buying a product, but in reality, you're just leasing it long-term.
In recent years, self-custody has seen a resurgence in crypto, accelerated by FTX's collapse. A lot of funds are flowing back into hardware wallets and self-managed solutions, driven by one core idea: take back control. Now, consumer electronics are experiencing the same awakening—users realize they have no say over even the most basic device functions and are starting to push back. The right to replace a battery may seem trivial, but it embodies the core demand: "My device, my rules."