Some projects got hammered during their token sales—had to scramble with revised terms just to reach their targets. Then there's into when it came to their public offering. It was different. The numbers tell the story: 400% oversubscribed with over $10M in commitments. That kind of traction doesn't happen by accident. Market appetite was there, execution was clean. A stark contrast to the chaos elsewhere in the space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 8h ago
400% oversubscription, $10 million commitment... Now that's what you call storytelling. Much more professional than those projects that keep changing terms randomly.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimistvip
· 01-07 02:54
400% oversubscription? 🤔 Sounds good, but I still need to see how things develop later. There are too many tricks in this circle.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 01-07 02:54
400% oversubscription? That number sounds a bit crazy. Is it real?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHuntervip
· 01-07 02:51
400% oversubscription? Something's not right with these numbers. We need to check the actual liquidity in the mempool and not be fooled by the surface figures.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 01-07 02:40
400% oversubscription? That number is indeed eye-catching, but to be honest, who still believes the market really has appetite these days? It just feels like a different trick to harvest retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)