2026-01-07 06:24:05

Friends with less than 1500U principal, instead of rushing to build positions, it's better to pause and listen to these three ironclad rules that truly make money. See how others are steadily growing in the crypto market.

There is a trader who entered with 1200U and turned it into 25,000U in four months. His account has now grown to over 38,000U, and he has never been liquidated during the process. You might think he's just lucky, but you're wrong. Let me clearly explain this methodology to you now.

**Rule 1: Funds should be divided into three parts; full position is a dead end**

Split 1200U like this:

· 400U for day trading: monitor one trade per day, take profits when targets are hit, don’t be greedy.

· 400U for swing trading: operate once every ten days to two weeks, aiming for large gains once you start.

· 400U as a reserve: keep it sealed and untouched, this is your last hope for a turnaround.

Most people end up blowing up their accounts by going all-in at once. Surviving is the first step to making money.

**Rule 2: Only take profits you can clearly see, don’t make reckless moves**

Crypto markets spend about 80% of the time consolidating. Reckless trading is just giving money away. When the market is sideways, lie flat and do nothing. Wait until the trend is clear before entering. Take profits when they arrive; take 30% off once profits exceed 20% of the principal. The true master’s logic is: "Don’t trade if you don’t have to; once you trade, you must eat well."

**Rule 3: Use mechanisms to replace emotions; this is the last fortress**

Set a stop-loss at 2% and stick to it.

When profits reach 4%, start reducing your position.

Never add to a losing position.

Pre-set all rules in advance, and do not change them during execution. Don’t let emotions interfere with decisions. The highest level of making money is actually simple: let your money run, don’t let your mood control your trades.

Honestly, having a small principal is not scary; what’s scary is always wanting to eat a big piece at once. Turning 1200U into 38,000U is not about luck, but about these strict rules that lock in risk and let profits run.

If you are still losing sleep over a few hundred U’s fluctuation, or cannot grasp the trend and control your positions, this logic is worth serious consideration. The details of position sizing, timing tricks, and mastery of the right moment are all contained in these three principles. Avoiding years of detours is more valuable than anything else.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWallflower

· 01-10 05:14

This 1200U turns into 38,000, easy to say, but can you really hold your emotions during actual trading? --- Looks pretty right, just not sure how that gentleman would react when faced with a black swan event. --- The key is execution. Most people forget after reading and go back to full positions. --- Listening to three parts sounds stable, but can you really wait ten days for that 400U swing? --- This card is well-versed in advice, but unfortunately, I’ve never let go. --- Stop-loss at 2% sounds simple, but can you really cut losses after a decline? --- This logic has no flaws, but the question is, how is the account of the person who wrote this now? --- Lying flat during sideways markets, easy to say, but I have to look twice every day to sleep. --- Taking a 30% profit when gains reach 20%, isn’t that always cutting into your profits? --- Wait, he achieved 32x in four months, that kind of probability must be extremely explosive. --- Mechanisms replace emotions, everyone knows that, but the key is how crucial execution is.

View OriginalReply0

governance_ghost

· 01-09 07:26

Dividing into three parts, I've been using this strategy for a long time. Indeed, surviving is the prerequisite for making money. --- It's that same story again, turning 1200U into 38,000, sounds great but how realistic is it? --- Stop-loss at 2% and reduce position by 4%, easy to say but really hard to do when it comes to actually holding up. --- Not adding to positions is the hardest part; when losing, your hands are trembling. --- I need to learn how to lie flat during sideways markets; I used to be among those who messed around and lost money. --- Replacing emotions with mechanisms is correct, but the problem is most people simply can't follow through. --- Going from 1200 to 38,000 feels like luck plays a big role; with the market so crazy, no one can say for sure. --- I agree with the logic of position splitting, but the real bottleneck is how to identify a clear trend. --- Setting a bottom card of 400 and not moving it is a good approach, at least leaving a backup plan. --- Monitoring one trade daily and stopping is a level of self-discipline that most people can't achieve.

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish

· 01-08 20:38

That's right, going all-in is suicide. I've seen too many friends blow up their accounts doing one big bet. --- Dividing into three parts sounds simple, but executing it is hell. So many people still can't control themselves. --- 2% stop-loss is truly an iron rule, but most people are still fantasizing about a rebound. --- 1200 to 38,000 is real, but in reviews, how many dare to follow this logic? --- The hardest part isn't the profit-making rules, it's that moment when emotion takes over your account. --- The sideways consolidation and laying flat—I learned that. I used to just trade recklessly and give money to the exchange. --- The question is who can actually only take the profits they clearly see? Usually, one moment of greed and you give it all back. --- I've known this framework all along. Execution is what separates life from death. Most people fail here.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 01-07 06:53

I've been trading for ten years. To be honest, I only recently truly understood this position-scaling logic. How many blood, sweat, and tears stories of margin calls have I had before? It seems like there's nothing wrong with it, but the key is in execution. Most people fail because of their mindset. It looks simple, but in practice, it's hell. I still tend to make impulsive moves. This example might be a bit exaggerated, but the idea is correct. For small funds, greed is the biggest taboo. I agree with dividing into three parts, but timing is really a big challenge. How can you determine a clear trend? The key is still that phrase: don't let your emotions drive your trading. That's so true. My problem is that I hesitate when I should cut, and I get too greedy when I should eat the loss. Looks like I need to set up a bot to help me make decisions.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-07 06:51

The key is whether you can really stick with it; most people forget after reading. --- 1200 to 38,000, just listen and don't take it seriously; those who survive are just survivor bias. --- It sounds good, but the real difficulty is in execution. I just died at the emotional hurdle. --- Splitting into three parts is nothing new; the core is still discipline in stop-loss. Without discipline, everything is useless. --- It's the same old story. The problem is that the trend becomes clear only after it has already risen, so it's not easy to catch the right entry point. --- 4% reduction in position? That's a bit conservative. In a bull market, such operations can lead to huge losses. --- You're right, but the underlying logic still requires enough principal for trial and error. 1200U is really too trivial.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-07 06:44

Really, I just want to ask if this guy has any drawdown records... --- Splitting a position into three equal parts sounds perfect, but the key is whether I can stick to it—I don't have that strong of a mindset. --- Stop loss at 2% and reduce position by 4%, these numbers sound so familiar... I think I saw them somewhere before. --- Going all-in and getting liquidated is indeed common, but in this example, how did that $1200U start? The scenario is too ideal. --- Sideways consolidation is the hardest part. Every time I get itchy, I start making random moves and paying fees. --- Rules are set in stone and not changed; it's easy to say but really tough to do... Once there's a loss, all kinds of thoughts start to pop up.

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 01-07 06:40

I've been using these three partial positions for a long time; the key is still being able to withstand the boredom during those sideways months.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-07 06:26

This story is just for listening, a survivor bias. --- 38,000 sounds great, but how many accounts like this have survived until now? --- Dividing into three parts is correct, but the key is to grasp the rhythm; this point wasn't fully explained in the article. --- I just want to ask, can you really copy every day within 400U? That's an exaggeration. --- A 2% stop loss sounds simple, but in practice, it can really crush your mentality. --- It seems logical and rigorous, but when has the market not been hit by a black swan? --- Divide your positions, but in the end, it still depends on your intuition; rules are just the framework. --- This theory might have been useful last year, but now the crypto market is too unpredictable. --- Can you really hold back the 400U bottom card? I can't do it, haha. --- Wow, another case of small principal doubling; but what's the probability?

View OriginalReply0