Our development team has been working behind the scenes to refine a decentralized social application, and this time we want to share some core progress with everyone.
The positioning of this application is somewhat similar to traditional social platforms, but the architecture is completely different. Users can directly send peer-to-peer tips, all personal data is controlled by the users themselves, private messages are end-to-end encrypted, and social interactions become easy and fun.
The key points are: the entire system has no centralized backend servers, does not require running nodes, has no indexers, no key management mechanisms, and eliminates censorship risks.
We are developing a series of similar application ecosystems based on Evolution, a truly decentralized technology stack. This is a serious exploration into Web3 application development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanLarry
· 19h ago
No centralized servers? Sounds impressive, but can it really run smoothly?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-07 12:57
Alright, another decentralized social platform. Is there really no backdoor this time?
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 01-07 12:55
Sounds good, but can it really achieve zero censorship? I feel like I've heard too many promises like that.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 01-07 12:55
It looks like another revolutionary project, but how many can actually get off the ground?
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 01-07 12:50
Sounds good, but I'm a bit curious about the node part—how do you ensure data consistency?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-07 12:43
no backend servers, no indexers, no key custodians... sure, but where's the actual threat model validation? feels like you're checking boxes rather than addressing what happens when the p2p mesh inevitably fragments. also—end-to-end encryption is table stakes now, not a feature. what's the real differentiation here, technically speaking?
Reply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-07 12:40
No centralized servers? Sounds great, but can it really run smoothly?
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 01-07 12:32
I'm curious about this point of not running nodes. How is data consistency ensured?
Our development team has been working behind the scenes to refine a decentralized social application, and this time we want to share some core progress with everyone.
The positioning of this application is somewhat similar to traditional social platforms, but the architecture is completely different. Users can directly send peer-to-peer tips, all personal data is controlled by the users themselves, private messages are end-to-end encrypted, and social interactions become easy and fun.
The key points are: the entire system has no centralized backend servers, does not require running nodes, has no indexers, no key management mechanisms, and eliminates censorship risks.
We are developing a series of similar application ecosystems based on Evolution, a truly decentralized technology stack. This is a serious exploration into Web3 application development.