Many people still misunderstand Walrus's positioning, thinking it's another DeFi or privacy project. In fact — its true mission on the Sui chain is to solve the big data storage problem for the entire Web3 ecosystem. From massive images and videos to various AI training data, Walrus can handle it all.
How do traditional solutions do it? Either pile data on the chain, which is prohibitively expensive; or rely on centralized servers, which become bottlenecks in performance and security. Walrus takes a different approach — based on a distributed storage architecture, allowing data to securely flow across the network, avoiding the sky-high transaction fees of on-chain storage, and not relying on single points of server failure. With this logic, the data processing efficiency of Web3 applications skyrockets, while costs are kept down.
In the current competitive landscape of storage, this kind of solution that combines economy and reliability indeed has promising potential.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BtcDailyResearcher
· 12h ago
Haha, finally someone explained it clearly. Previously, everyone was just guessing what Walrus is based on comments.
Storing data really hits a bottleneck, is a distributed solution reliable? It still depends on actual usage volume.
Wait, can the costs really be reduced? How does it compare to the Filecoin approach?
Honestly, the most lacking infrastructure on the Sui chain is exactly this. I'm a bit期待.
Both storage and AI data—this track looks quite promising.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 23h ago
Late at night, I checked Walrus's contract deployment records. Distributed storage is indeed more reliable than relying solely on on-chain solutions... It’s worth noting whether cost pressure can truly be resolved; it depends on actual TPS data.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 01-08 12:39
Ah, it's another storage story. Can it beat Arweave this time?
View OriginalReply0
TokenStorm
· 01-07 19:44
I understand the logic of distributed storage, but to be honest, on-chain data shows that Walrus's node activity hasn't reached full capacity. The risk factor isn't that optimistic. However, since the Sui ecosystem is accelerating, there might indeed be arbitrage opportunities. I'll still make a small-scale move.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 01-07 19:43
By the way, Walrus's approach is quite effective; distributed storage is indeed a pain point.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 01-07 19:29
Walrus really addresses the pain points, but to be honest, with so many players in the storage track, how many can actually survive?
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 01-07 19:26
Distributed storage is indeed a pain point, and the Walrus approach still has some potential.
Many people still misunderstand Walrus's positioning, thinking it's another DeFi or privacy project. In fact — its true mission on the Sui chain is to solve the big data storage problem for the entire Web3 ecosystem. From massive images and videos to various AI training data, Walrus can handle it all.
How do traditional solutions do it? Either pile data on the chain, which is prohibitively expensive; or rely on centralized servers, which become bottlenecks in performance and security. Walrus takes a different approach — based on a distributed storage architecture, allowing data to securely flow across the network, avoiding the sky-high transaction fees of on-chain storage, and not relying on single points of server failure. With this logic, the data processing efficiency of Web3 applications skyrockets, while costs are kept down.
In the current competitive landscape of storage, this kind of solution that combines economy and reliability indeed has promising potential.