2026-01-08 09:29:41

OTC trading should indeed be done this way. The most interesting part is that it completely separates transparency and privacy.

The logic of the Miden solution is very clear: on-chain data is fully verifiable, transaction records and price information are transparent and accessible, but your identity information is completely hidden. Market participants know what happened but do not know who was involved.

This is how privacy should return—not to evade regulation, but to allow both parties in a transaction to maintain their own private space. Market transparency and personal privacy are not mutually exclusive.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 2h ago

It sounds good, but I've been through it all. The privacy coin projects in 2018, weren't they eventually delisted by exchanges and scrutinized by regulators? Now Miden's "transparent + privacy" solution sounds like it's trying to play a risky game. On-chain verifiability ≠ security, and hiding identities in the eyes of the US SEC is considered malicious. Let's see the true test in the bear market.

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever