Sometimes I wonder, do those promoting the DeSci理念 still remember the original vision of science? Decentralized science should break the monopoly of traditional academic circles and allow more innovative thinkers to participate in scientific research. But now it seems that many projects have deviated from this path. I don't know where the DeSci ecosystem will ultimately head—will it return to its original purpose or become just another hype?

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SilentObservervip
· 01-08 19:10
Bro, that really hits home. At first, everyone was confidently saying they would break the game, and now? They're just playing the same tricks again. DeSci has gone from idealism to making quick money, it's really ironic.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_traumavip
· 01-08 19:10
I've seen through it long ago; DeSci will ultimately be corrupted by capital, no surprises.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 01-08 19:10
Bro, you hit the nail on the head. When DeSci first came out, it was indeed full of idealism. Now, looking at it, 90% are just playing the tokenomics game...
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 01-08 19:07
Haha, another story of idealism dying in the face of reality. I used to believe in the original rhetoric of DeSci, but now? A bunch of shitcoins pretending to be scientific to harvest profits.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)