Grossman’s thesis challenges conventional wisdom: meme coins aren’t just speculative vehicles—they’re infrastructure for a more accessible attention economy, and their evolution is inevitable.
The Untapped Potential Beyond Viral Moments
MoonPay’s top executive recently articulated a contrarian view about the trajectory of meme coins that deserves serious consideration. Rather than dismissing them as temporary market phenomena, Grossman sees meme coins as embodying a structural innovation that fundamentally reshapes how value attaches to cultural moments and community engagement. The distinction matters: what appears frivolous on the surface masks genuine technological capability that didn’t exist in the pre-blockchain era.
Reframing Attention as a Tokenizable Asset
The core mechanism Grossman emphasizes isn’t about humor or branding—it’s about efficiency. The attention economy already exists as a multitrillion-dollar sector where platforms, content creators, and influencers extract massive value. What changed with meme coins is the cost structure and speed of participation.
Historically, capturing economic value from cultural moments required institutional gatekeepers: venture capital firms, media corporations, or platform monopolies. These intermediaries controlled the infrastructure and extracted rents. Meme coins compress this entire workflow into minutes. A concept can achieve tokenization, achieve liquidity, and distribute ownership across a global community without a single intermediary. The technical capability to do this at near-zero friction represents a genuine innovation regardless of how it’s currently deployed.
Dismantling Traditional Gatekeeping
Grossman’s argument hinges on democratization mechanics. The conventional attention economy restricts upside participation to insiders and capital holders. You observe a viral trend, but you don’t capture its economic value—platform shareholders and early investors do.
Meme coins invert this distribution. They enable anyone to launch a token tied to cultural relevance, and anyone to hold ownership stakes. This applies symmetrically: both creators launching tokens and participants investing in them participate in a more level ecosystem than traditional finance permits. Whether this distribution is equally durable or sustainable remains contested, but the mechanism itself represents genuine accessibility infrastructure.
Anticipating the Next Evolution
When Grossman predicts that meme coins will “return in a different form,” he’s signaling that today’s implementations are prototypes rather than final products. Evolution could incorporate governance layers, creator-economy integration, or sophisticated tokenomics that address current sustainability criticism while preserving the core innovation.
Future iterations might tokenize membership in creator communities, ownership stakes in cultural movements, or participation rights in emerging economies—all maintaining the low-friction, low-cost characteristics that define the current meme coin category.
Market Dynamics and Current Headwinds
The meme coin sector currently faces legitimate criticism. High-profile failures, insider wealth transfers, and retail investor losses create justified skepticism. Critics accurately observe that many implementations exploit retail participation rather than serve genuine value capture.
Yet Grossman’s framing invites a distinction worth considering: the mechanism itself versus its current instantiation. The underlying technology that enables rapid tokenization and distributed ownership is genuinely novel. Whether that technology ultimately serves speculation or sustainable value creation depends on how it evolves.
What Markets Should Watch
If Grossman’s thesis holds, subsequent innovation cycles should produce meme coins with more sophisticated architecture—better tokenomics, clearer utility, integration with real-world economic activity. Projects that successfully balance meme coin accessibility with sustainable models may capture significant market value.
The intersection of social dynamics, creator economics, and blockchain tokenization remains a frontier of experimentation. Meme coins, despite current imperfections, represent early attempts at solving a real problem: how to efficiently monetize and distribute value from collective attention. Whether the next generation of these coins solves that problem more effectively will likely determine whether Grossman’s prediction of evolution and return materializes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
How MoonPay President Keith Grossman Views Meme Coins' Next Chapter
Grossman’s thesis challenges conventional wisdom: meme coins aren’t just speculative vehicles—they’re infrastructure for a more accessible attention economy, and their evolution is inevitable.
The Untapped Potential Beyond Viral Moments
MoonPay’s top executive recently articulated a contrarian view about the trajectory of meme coins that deserves serious consideration. Rather than dismissing them as temporary market phenomena, Grossman sees meme coins as embodying a structural innovation that fundamentally reshapes how value attaches to cultural moments and community engagement. The distinction matters: what appears frivolous on the surface masks genuine technological capability that didn’t exist in the pre-blockchain era.
Reframing Attention as a Tokenizable Asset
The core mechanism Grossman emphasizes isn’t about humor or branding—it’s about efficiency. The attention economy already exists as a multitrillion-dollar sector where platforms, content creators, and influencers extract massive value. What changed with meme coins is the cost structure and speed of participation.
Historically, capturing economic value from cultural moments required institutional gatekeepers: venture capital firms, media corporations, or platform monopolies. These intermediaries controlled the infrastructure and extracted rents. Meme coins compress this entire workflow into minutes. A concept can achieve tokenization, achieve liquidity, and distribute ownership across a global community without a single intermediary. The technical capability to do this at near-zero friction represents a genuine innovation regardless of how it’s currently deployed.
Dismantling Traditional Gatekeeping
Grossman’s argument hinges on democratization mechanics. The conventional attention economy restricts upside participation to insiders and capital holders. You observe a viral trend, but you don’t capture its economic value—platform shareholders and early investors do.
Meme coins invert this distribution. They enable anyone to launch a token tied to cultural relevance, and anyone to hold ownership stakes. This applies symmetrically: both creators launching tokens and participants investing in them participate in a more level ecosystem than traditional finance permits. Whether this distribution is equally durable or sustainable remains contested, but the mechanism itself represents genuine accessibility infrastructure.
Anticipating the Next Evolution
When Grossman predicts that meme coins will “return in a different form,” he’s signaling that today’s implementations are prototypes rather than final products. Evolution could incorporate governance layers, creator-economy integration, or sophisticated tokenomics that address current sustainability criticism while preserving the core innovation.
Future iterations might tokenize membership in creator communities, ownership stakes in cultural movements, or participation rights in emerging economies—all maintaining the low-friction, low-cost characteristics that define the current meme coin category.
Market Dynamics and Current Headwinds
The meme coin sector currently faces legitimate criticism. High-profile failures, insider wealth transfers, and retail investor losses create justified skepticism. Critics accurately observe that many implementations exploit retail participation rather than serve genuine value capture.
Yet Grossman’s framing invites a distinction worth considering: the mechanism itself versus its current instantiation. The underlying technology that enables rapid tokenization and distributed ownership is genuinely novel. Whether that technology ultimately serves speculation or sustainable value creation depends on how it evolves.
What Markets Should Watch
If Grossman’s thesis holds, subsequent innovation cycles should produce meme coins with more sophisticated architecture—better tokenomics, clearer utility, integration with real-world economic activity. Projects that successfully balance meme coin accessibility with sustainable models may capture significant market value.
The intersection of social dynamics, creator economics, and blockchain tokenization remains a frontier of experimentation. Meme coins, despite current imperfections, represent early attempts at solving a real problem: how to efficiently monetize and distribute value from collective attention. Whether the next generation of these coins solves that problem more effectively will likely determine whether Grossman’s prediction of evolution and return materializes.