What is Billions doing? It’s much more than just an application. Look at its ambition — to build a brand new identity infrastructure for the internet.



The core logic is simple: KYA (Know Your Agent). This system allows both humans and AI agents to be verified, establish trust, and receive rewards on-chain.

Why is this important? The problem is right in front of us. The internet is flooded with untraceable bots and fake identities. No one knows if they are interacting with a real person or a script. Information is chaotic, and transactions lack security. What Billions aims to do is a reverse operation — through on-chain verification and incentive mechanisms, to give each participant (whether human or AI) a trustworthy identity label, building a transparent and traceable network.

This is not just a technical issue; it’s a new direction for Web3 to reconstruct trust. When identities are verifiable and rewardable, the entire ecosystem’s game rules are changed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SocialFiQueenvip
· 18h ago
KYA this idea isn't bad, but what problems might we encounter when it actually gets implemented? How to prevent AI identities from being faked? --- On-chain identity verification sounds sexy, but I wonder if it will become just another tool for centralized power. --- Haha, finally someone wants to solve the robot problem, but I bet five bucks it still relies on centralized review. --- Billions, this is interesting. If KYA is rolled out widely, Web3 will truly have a solid foundation. --- Easy to say, but once the incentive mechanism kicks in, it immediately opens up new arbitrage opportunities. Let's wait and see. --- I like this logic; it precisely addresses what I dislike most — not knowing if the other side is a real person or a robot. --- Reverse operation, reverse operation, sounds good, but the question is: who will verify this verification system itself? --- It seems Billions is betting on a big direction. If it succeeds, it will indeed change the game rules. --- Is trust valuable? Of course, money. The question is, how to price it. --- It sounds very idealistic, but is that really what the internet truly needs?
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42vip
· 01-10 15:49
KYA this set of things sounds good, but how many geniuses are needed to really implement it is anyone's guess... On-chain identity verification itself is very difficult, not to mention the incentive mechanisms needed to support it. That requires a huge ecosystem backing. Finally, someone wants to solve the problem of bots everywhere on the internet. It should have been done a long time ago. Verifiable identities and rewards? Sounds like the ultimate spoiler for the entire Web3 game rules. If Billions can really succeed, it’s more than just an application; it could definitely rewrite the pace of internet order. The key question is how to anchor trust values and token worth—that's the real challenge. It feels a bit idealistic, but I still want to see what they can actually create.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 01-10 15:42
KYA this concept sounds good, but how many problems can it really solve when implemented? Or is it just another idealistic fantasy of Web3 On-chain identity verification? It sounds easy to say, but how is privacy protected? The idea of Billions is interesting; finally, someone is addressing the trust crisis on the internet Speaking of AI agents being verifiable... does that mean the difficulty of fake orders and wool pulling has increased again? How is this incentive mechanism designed? Will it turn into a new gambling game again? It seems that instead of verifying identity, we should first make gas fees cheaper Trust infrastructure is a good direction, but can Billions handle this task? KYA sounds like another buzzword; it depends on how the actual user experience turns out
View OriginalReply0
HashBanditvip
· 01-10 15:41
ngl, KYA sounds good on paper but we've heard this pitch before... back in my mining days we thought verification was gonna solve everything too lol. gas fees gonna make this either revolutionary or dead on arrival, tbh
Reply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 01-10 15:40
On-chain identity verification sounds good, but the real bottleneck is how to design the incentive mechanism. --- The concept of KYA is interesting; finally, someone wants to solve the problem of bots flooding everywhere. --- Basically, it's about bringing identity onto the chain, making it traceable and verifiable—feels like creating an "identity passport" for the internet. --- Wait, how is privacy protected in this case? On-chain verifiability means exposure. --- I've always thought it's a bit strange to use the same trust system for AI agents and humans, but if it can effectively curb fake accounts, it's definitely a viable idea. --- If billions can truly solve the robot problem, then this track is worth paying attention to, but I remain pessimistic about the implementation difficulty. --- The root cause of information chaos isn't really identity verification; misaligned incentives are the real cancer. --- Interestingly, binding rewards to identity allows for direct punishment of bad actors. --- We've heard "Web3 'rebuilding trust'" too many times; the key is how long this verification mechanism can hold up. --- If both humans and AI need to be verified, will the level of centralization revert back?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-10 15:39
Really, now there are fake accounts and bots everywhere, and no one can tell who they are actually chatting with. The idea of Billions is quite interesting. On-chain identity verification feels like the ultimate solution, but the key is whether enough people are willing to use it... KYA sounds good, but I don't know if it can really be implemented. It feels like another great vision, waiting to be taught a lesson by reality. Basically, it's about using economic incentives to prevent malicious behavior. This approach definitely works. Traceable identities are indeed necessary, but that also means losing anonymity—it's a dilemma. Web3 needs to rebuild trust, and the first step is to solve the fee issue; otherwise, no one can afford to use it. Let's wait until Billions officially launches; there's been too much talk already.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinjavip
· 01-10 15:21
Is this logic really solid? Finally, someone is going to put an end to these fake accounts on the internet. --- Basically, it's about putting identities on the chain; even robots need to be real-identity verified, so they can participate. --- It feels a bit like installing a social trust system on the internet, but doing this on the chain is much more reliable. --- Wait, if that's the case, how can we continue to exploit loopholes in the future? Will we really need to register and verify? --- Web3 rebuilding trust has been talked about many times. Can Billions break through this time? --- Actually, someone should have done this long ago. Countless times been deceived by robots. --- On-chain verification sounds appealing, but who controls the permissions? That's the key.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)