Recently, there has been an interesting development — the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission removed "cryptographic assets" from its list of key risks in 2026. This sounds like a significant signal.
Industry insiders have responded quite positively. Some openly say that from a regulatory perspective, this change could indicate a shift in market cycles. However, there are also rational voices reminding everyone not to overinterpret, as there are still many variables between policy adjustments and market trends.
On the other hand, if this policy truly marks a change in the attitude toward the crypto market, it would indeed be a positive signal for investors. But the idea of a "super cycle" should still be approached with caution — markets always have two sides, and policy favorable conditions do not guarantee a guaranteed rally.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Recently, there has been an interesting development — the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission removed "cryptographic assets" from its list of key risks in 2026. This sounds like a significant signal.
Industry insiders have responded quite positively. Some openly say that from a regulatory perspective, this change could indicate a shift in market cycles. However, there are also rational voices reminding everyone not to overinterpret, as there are still many variables between policy adjustments and market trends.
On the other hand, if this policy truly marks a change in the attitude toward the crypto market, it would indeed be a positive signal for investors. But the idea of a "super cycle" should still be approached with caution — markets always have two sides, and policy favorable conditions do not guarantee a guaranteed rally.