Already gaining significant attention even before official launch, how much potential does it have for future development?
From a fundamental perspective, there are several supporting points worth noting:
First, the project itself has received investment or backing from leading institutions, coupled with continuous market exposure, indicating a relatively high level of recognition.
Second, this is not just a MEME token; the product's depth can be infinitely extended. The true core lies in the complete closed-loop empowerment of the token—attracting users into the application ecosystem through the token, with transaction fees generated by the application supporting the token's value, creating a self-sustaining flywheel effect.
Additionally, this type of concept is currently in the warm-up phase of market enthusiasm, making the timing quite suitable. Under this model, the token shifts from a purely speculative asset to one with real use cases and economic value, opening up a different realm of imagination.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 21h ago
It sounds pretty bleak—it's both a flywheel and a closed loop, and in the end, it's just about who can take over.
I'm tired of hearing this kind of rhetoric; there are very few that can actually be implemented successfully.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 21h ago
The hype was already so high before launch; I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen this flywheel logic.
But with institutional endorsement + real application scenarios, this combination is indeed much more reliable than pure MEME.
Wait, can it really form a self-sustaining cycle, or is this just another round of cutting leeks?
I'm quite interested; the key is how the subsequent ecosystem will be built.
This timing is indeed good; I'll get on board first.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 21h ago
Institutional endorsement + closed-loop flywheel, it sounds great, but the hype is usually highest before launch. It depends on whether the subsequent supply chain can hold up.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasis
· 21h ago
I have to question the endorsement from major institutions—how many of them can truly deliver? Having only hype without implementation is pointless; in the end, it's just a mess.
Already gaining significant attention even before official launch, how much potential does it have for future development?
From a fundamental perspective, there are several supporting points worth noting:
First, the project itself has received investment or backing from leading institutions, coupled with continuous market exposure, indicating a relatively high level of recognition.
Second, this is not just a MEME token; the product's depth can be infinitely extended. The true core lies in the complete closed-loop empowerment of the token—attracting users into the application ecosystem through the token, with transaction fees generated by the application supporting the token's value, creating a self-sustaining flywheel effect.
Additionally, this type of concept is currently in the warm-up phase of market enthusiasm, making the timing quite suitable. Under this model, the token shifts from a purely speculative asset to one with real use cases and economic value, opening up a different realm of imagination.