2026-01-10 18:24:45

At the start of 2025, the oracle solutions on TRON are taking action frequently. WINkLink has already onboarded 17 strategic partners, covering exchanges, wallets, GameFi, identity verification, and infrastructure—completely covering all aspects. From established data service providers to emerging wallet ecosystems, almost no key player is missing.

The core of this combination lies in the functionality layer. Price Services handles price feeds, VRF manages random number generation, AnyAPI extends access to arbitrary data, and Automation is responsible for automated execution—these four components essentially cover the main use cases of Web3 applications, from DeFi pricing to on-chain gaming and automated strategies.

In simple terms, the essence of ecological cooperation is to lower the barriers for developers to access. Leading products across various fields gather together; anyone wanting to build trusted computing applications can connect directly, reducing a lot of hassle. How far this wave can go depends on how many projects will actually start using it later.

TRX0,31%

WIN0,75%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldFarmRefugee

· 10h ago

17 partners sound like a lot, but how many are truly active? --- This thing is just the old trick of lowering the barrier to entry; the key still depends on whether the project team is willing to put in the effort. --- The "Big Four" sound great, but whether they are reliable in practice is the real test. --- Another bunch of official data; let's wait and see how many projects with real funds actually get off the ground. --- Hmm... Low barriers for developers to access is a good thing, but I'm worried it might just become another PPT ecosystem. --- WINkLink really went all out this time; it depends on whether the TRON ecosystem will buy in. --- Price feeding, randomness, automation... sound all-powerful, but what about stability? --- Having many partners doesn't necessarily mean the ecosystem is active; we need to look at real data and trading volume. --- Accurate price feeding is the core; no matter how many other features there are, they are useless without it.

View OriginalReply0

ForkThisDAO

· 15h ago

17 partners sound like a lot, but there probably aren't that many truly useful projects. Let's wait and see how they are implemented later.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 01-11 05:02

17 partners sound impressive, but how many are actually using it? --- Price feeds, random numbers, automated execution... all sound versatile, but it's hard to say if there's a killer app to support them. --- Lowering the barrier is a common pitch every project talks about; the key is who is truly building within the ecosystem. --- TRON's new moves with the oracle feel a bit like riding the trend. --- Stacking strategic partnerships is great, but without real applications and implementation, it's all just empty talk. --- The "Four Horsemen" sounds good, but I'm worried it might just end up as a PPT product. --- This early-year move either means there's really something there or it's just routine preheating before a harvest of new investors.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-10 18:54

17 partners may sound like a lot, but the key is how long this supply line can hold. History has shown us that ecological alliances are most likely to be exposed during a bear market.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 01-10 18:50

ah here we go again... 17 partners, 4 pillars, "ecosystem synergy" — statistically speaking, this reads exactly like the chainlink narrative circa 2020 before reality set in. let me check the charts... yep, adoption always looks pristine on paper until nobody actually uses it lmao

Reply0

LayerZeroJunkie

· 01-10 18:50

17 partners sound impressive, but I'm worried it's just on paper ecology. How many are actually being used?

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 01-10 18:48

17 partners sound impressive, but the key is still the actual usage rate; otherwise, it's just a numbers game. WINkLink's four-pronged approach is indeed comprehensive, but I still want to see which projects will truly take off rather than just stay at the partnership level. I agree with lowering the barrier for developers, but whether most projects can actually utilize it remains uncertain. Why does it feel like it's always the same combination punch? 17 partners are quite a lot, but how many will actually come to fruition in the end? I'm a bit hopeful yet numb at the same time, waiting to see if this won't just be another hype. This time, the organization is quite thorough; it all depends on whether TRON can really support this ecosystem. With so many partners, will they just each do their own thing again?

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 01-10 18:46

Seventeen partners sound like a lot, but I'm just worried it might turn into the same old story of chaos later on. How many of them will actually be used in practice? That's the key. WINkLink's recent integration is pretty good; we'll see how the four pillars work together. Lowering the developer threshold is a good thing, but the success of the ecosystem still depends on how well it is implemented. Having many partners doesn't necessarily mean the ecosystem is active; this needs to be clearly distinguished. Having just a toolchain isn't enough; real projects need to actually use it.

View OriginalReply0

DuskSurfer

· 01-10 18:30

17 partners sound impressive, but how many can actually be utilized? The key still depends on whether there are real projects integrated, otherwise it's just the PPT ecosystem. WINkLink's architecture design this time is comprehensive, but I'm just worried it will be all talk and no action again.

View OriginalReply0