Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Is the ultimate goal of AI to develop more powerful models or to create a more open network?
Most people focus on the former because it's more intuitive, but the true determinant of value distribution is often the latter.
Recently, I've been observing @dgrid_ai, and a clear signal is that they haven't focused on building the strongest model but are trying to distribute existing model capabilities across an accessible network.
In other words, they are more like working on the "infrastructure layer" of AI rather than the application layer.
This approach is actually quite similar to the early internet, transitioning from centralized servers to a distributed network, but the process won't be so smooth.
Because AI's computational costs are much higher than traditional services, it demands greater network stability and performance.
So the question is straightforward: can this model find a balance between cost and performance?
If not, it will be hard to compete with centralized services. If yes, it could change who owns AI.
Many people are still comparing model effectiveness, but what truly matters is who is reshaping the underlying operational methods.
@Galxe @GalxeQuest @easydotfunX @wallchain #Ad #Affiliate @TermMaxFi