Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Vitalik Buterin’s solution might not be the best, Chiliz CSO says
Chiliz chief strategy officer Max Rabinovitch recently discussed Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin’s efforts to address centralization in Ethereum’s validation structure
In an interview with crypto.news, Rabinovitch explained that while Buterin’s solutions are suitable for Ethereum (ETH), they may not apply universally to all networks that rely on Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility.
Buterin’s proposed approach seeks to reduce validator centralization by lowering entry barriers for participants and capping rewards to prevent validator consolidation
According to Rabinovitch, this effort targets Ethereum’s unique issues. “He’s solving an Ethereum problem, not a universal EVM problem,” Rabinovitch said.
The industry pundit stressed that each blockchain has distinct needs that may not benefit from Ethereum-specific fixes.
Centralization remains a major concern for Ethereum, with just two validators responsible for nearly 87% of block production. Rabinovitch admitted that such concentration undermines blockchain’s foundational principles
Decentralization or bust?
Rabinovitch also addressed the widely held “decentralization-or-bust” philosophy in the crypto space, describing it as overly simplistic
He believes that effective decentralization can be achieved through curated participant requirements, which could bolster network flexibility while maintaining security
“It is essential to remain diverse enough that no single stakeholder… can easily subvert the governance of a protocol,” he said, suggesting a balance between decentralization and practical governance.
To reduce centralization risks, Rabinovitch suggested several alternative measures for Ethereum. These include implementing validation rules that limit how often a node can confirm blocks and incorporating operational metrics beyond mere staking requirements, such as uptime and voting consistency
He explained that these steps could create a more equitable validator space and prevent a small number of players from dominating the network.
Meanwhile, Rabinovitch acknowledged that governance optimization is a gradual, ongoing process for all blockchain protocols, acknowledging that one definite solution might not be ultimately suitable.