When precious metals took the lead, Bitcoin was actually already half a step ahead. This is not just market fluctuation; the logic behind it points to America's $3.8 trillion national debt problem.
There's a topic that's becoming increasingly difficult to discuss in mainstream media, but from a logical chain perspective, it's actually standing more and more firmly—
America's true debt export probably isn't in the congressional voting chamber at all, but hidden in the revaluation of asset prices.
When debt scale breaks through a critical point, fiscal language starts falling apart. Policy rhetoric becomes hollow and powerless. In the end, only one thing actually works: price.
At the beginning of the year, Trump threw out a viewpoint: "Cryptocurrency can help America solve the $37 trillion debt problem." At the time, people in the circle thought he was chasing hype. Looking at it today, while this statement isn't expressed completely enough, it's actually not quite as absurd as it sounds.
**First: Let's be clear—America never actually needs to "pay off" debt**
Looking through history, no superpower has ever completed a debt cycle through serious debt repayment. In reality, only three scenarios have occurred:
Inflation and time consume the debt Currency depreciates actively or passively Assets are revalued
These three paths have one thing in common—they all bypass congressional voting.
**Second: Why does the Bitcoin path look like a feint?**
If America really wanted to solve this with BTC in one step: Bitcoin would need to reach the millions-of-dollars level. By then, the market value of BTC held by the US government would mathematically approach the scale of US debt. But this path is too radical, too conspicuous, too easy to spiral out of control. True established empires have always used more discreet methods.
Oh so Trump's remarks weren't just riding on hype - this guy was genuinely hinting at the playbook... But then again, can America's debt problem really be solved through asset revaluation? This logic sounds a bit too "perfect."
When precious metals took the lead, Bitcoin was actually already half a step ahead. This is not just market fluctuation; the logic behind it points to America's $3.8 trillion national debt problem.
There's a topic that's becoming increasingly difficult to discuss in mainstream media, but from a logical chain perspective, it's actually standing more and more firmly—
America's true debt export probably isn't in the congressional voting chamber at all, but hidden in the revaluation of asset prices.
When debt scale breaks through a critical point, fiscal language starts falling apart. Policy rhetoric becomes hollow and powerless. In the end, only one thing actually works: price.
At the beginning of the year, Trump threw out a viewpoint: "Cryptocurrency can help America solve the $37 trillion debt problem." At the time, people in the circle thought he was chasing hype. Looking at it today, while this statement isn't expressed completely enough, it's actually not quite as absurd as it sounds.
**First: Let's be clear—America never actually needs to "pay off" debt**
Looking through history, no superpower has ever completed a debt cycle through serious debt repayment. In reality, only three scenarios have occurred:
Inflation and time consume the debt
Currency depreciates actively or passively
Assets are revalued
These three paths have one thing in common—they all bypass congressional voting.
**Second: Why does the Bitcoin path look like a feint?**
If America really wanted to solve this with BTC in one step: Bitcoin would need to reach the millions-of-dollars level. By then, the market value of BTC held by the US government would mathematically approach the scale of US debt. But this path is too radical, too conspicuous, too easy to spiral out of control. True established empires have always used more discreet methods.