
"Trading below issue price" refers to a scenario where a token’s market price falls below its original offering price on the secondary market. This “issue price” is typically set during primary fundraising events such as an ICO, IEO, or IDO.
The issue price can be understood as the pre-launch valuation, similar to the IPO issue price in traditional equity markets. The secondary market refers to exchanges where tokens are freely traded, and prices are determined by real-time buy and sell orders. If actual demand, uncertainty, or token supply dynamics after listing differ from what was assumed at the time of issuance, the price may fall below the original issue price.
Common reasons include mismatches between supply and demand and adjustments to market expectations. Examples are: a very small circulating supply paired with an overvalued issue price, early investors selling tokens en masse after unlock events, or a general downturn in market sentiment.
A typical situation is when only a small portion of tokens are released during the initial phase at a high valuation, but there is not enough new demand in the secondary market to support the price. Insufficient market making (i.e., lack of liquidity provision by institutions or strategies) can also lead to steep price drops when sell pressure mounts. Additionally, in periods of broad market correction or waning narratives, risk appetite declines, resulting in increased selling and reduced buying activity, which makes it more likely for the price to dip below issue price.
A token trading below its issue price is often linked to its FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation). FDV represents the total valuation based on the maximum possible token supply, analogous to calculating a company’s market cap assuming all potential shares are outstanding.
If the FDV implied by the issue price is excessively high while the actual circulating market cap (circulating supply times price) remains small, the market may adjust valuation downward through price correction. For example, if there are 1 billion total tokens with only 5% in circulation at launch and an FDV of $1 billion at issue price, the initial circulating market cap is just $50 million. If the project’s fundamentals and demand do not justify a $1 billion FDV, prices often revert and may fall below issue price. Conversely, a reasonable FDV supported by clear incremental demand reduces the likelihood of trading below issue price.
When faced with a token trading below its issue price, first assess the reasons and your own risk tolerance before deciding whether to cut losses, hold, or average in. Do not use the “issue price” as your only benchmark.
Step 1: Clarify your entry cost, position size, and investment horizon. Short-term and long-term strategies differ in terms of stop-loss levels and patience required.
Step 2: Review the unlock schedule. Token unlocks—where locked tokens are gradually released—often introduce additional sell pressure around major unlock dates.
Step 3: Evaluate liquidity depth and market making stability. If order books are thin and slippage is significant, both aggressive buying and selling can incur unexpectedly high costs.
Step 4: Reassess project fundamentals. Consider whether product development, user growth, revenue, or actual use cases are being delivered. Lack of progress increases downside risk.
Step 5: Develop an execution plan. Set rules for averaging in or cutting losses to avoid emotional trading; document each decision and outcome for future review.
To check whether a token has fallen below its issue price on Gate, compare the original issue price with the latest spot trading price, taking into account transaction fees and slippage.
Step 1: On Gate’s Launchpad or project announcement page, look up the issue price and sale allocation; check for any reward or vesting terms.
Step 2: On Gate’s spot trading page, search for the token, view its latest price and candlestick chart, and draw a reference line at the issue price for comparison.
Step 3: Open depth charts and trade statistics to observe order book thickness and slippage. The thinner the liquidity depth, the larger the slippage.
Step 4: On the project info page, review circulating supply, upcoming unlock schedules, and token distribution structure to assess short-term sell pressure risks.
Step 5: Use price alerts and conditional orders to set notifications or automate trades, helping you avoid missing moves due to lack of monitoring.
Trading below issue price signals a market repricing event and comes with risks such as insufficient liquidity, unlock-related sell pressure, withdrawal of market makers, and heightened volatility. If rebounds are driven mainly by short-term sentiment rather than fundamentals, drawdowns can be especially steep.
For asset safety: In low-liquidity environments, buys or sells can incur high slippage—actual transaction costs may far exceed expectations. Blindly averaging down can lead to overexposure and amplified risk. It is advisable to limit position sizes, keep spare capital available, and avoid high leverage.
Trading below issue price can indicate “valuation reversion,” but should not be used as a standalone buy signal; it must be considered alongside fundamentals and supply structure.
In early stages, if product launches progress, user numbers grow, the team continues delivering results, FDV remains reasonable, and unlocks are smooth, post-issue-price stability may offer an observation window. Conversely, if there is little development progress, high token concentration in few addresses, or clustered unlocks, trading below issue price likely signals higher risk rather than opportunity. Combining time frames and catalysts is more effective than relying solely on price action.
Common misconceptions include: believing prices will always return to the issue price; buying more without limits as prices fall; equating low prices with low risk; ignoring transaction fees and slippage; assuming that trading below issue price means a project has failed or “rugged.”
The issue price is just a historical reference point—not an anchor of value. Any increase in position size or stop-loss should be based on evidence from supply/demand dynamics and fundamentals; real transaction costs must include fees and slippage; project failure is an extreme scenario that should be evaluated through contract security audits, fund flows, and team behavior—not solely by observing price drops.
Trading below issue price reflects the market’s reassessment of primary market valuations. Assessment should start with supply structure and FDV, then examine unlock schedules and token distribution. Next, consider liquidity depth and actual demand before aligning your strategy and risk tolerance with your investment timeline. For beginners: treat issue price as a reference—not a benchmark—use Gate’s issuance data, spot prices, liquidity depth, and unlock schedules for cross-validation, and improve decision quality through strict position sizing and stop-loss management.
Trading below issue price means a token’s current market value is lower than its initial public offering or listing price—often signaling reduced market confidence in the project. It is an important indicator for assessing early performance and market sentiment. While it helps identify high-risk projects, it should not be your only basis for investment decisions.
Yes—some tokens do recover after dropping below their issue price, but probabilities vary by project. Key factors include improvements in fundamentals, team execution capabilities, and overall market cycles. Some projects rebound through product upgrades or market recovery; many others remain underperforming long-term. On Gate, conduct thorough research into project progress before considering purchases—do not bottom-fish based solely on falling prices.
Assess several factors: check post-listing price trends (using candlestick charts on Gate or other exchanges), compare issue prices with current prices; research fundraising details and early investor vesting arrangements. Also evaluate community engagement, development progress, and current market interest—all of which impact token performance. Make decisions only after thorough due diligence to avoid high-risk trades.
This depends on your evaluation of the project’s prospects and your personal risk tolerance. First, check for signs of deteriorating fundamentals (such as team departures or stalled development), consider your investment goals and stop-loss thresholds. Avoid passively holding out for rebounds—make proactive decisions instead. If you conclude that prospects are poor, cut losses decisively rather than tying up capital long-term.
There is correlation but not causation. Trading below issue price reflects recent poor market performance but does not determine long-term project success—which depends on technology, adoption, operations, and more. Many successful projects in history experienced periods of trading below their issue price before achieving long-term value appreciation. Thus, trading below issue price should be seen as a risk signal requiring comprehensive evaluation of project fundamentals—not as a definitive indicator of failure.


