Ethereum network resilience progress evident: active addresses exceed 790,000, transaction fees drop to $0.15

ETH3,47%
ARB1,48%
OP3,23%
SOL0,7%

On January 14, news came out that as the long-term technical roadmap is gradually implemented, improvements in the Ethereum network’s user activity and usage costs have begun to show results. The on-chain data platform Nansen shows that as of this Monday, the number of active addresses on Ethereum has exceeded 791,000, significantly higher than mainstream Layer 2 networks such as Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism, indicating that the appeal of the Ethereum mainnet is on the rebound.

From a cost perspective, the average daily transaction fee on Ethereum has also dropped to a historic low. Data shows that the current average fee per transaction is about $0.15, compared to $11 a year ago. Overall, the significant optimization of the fee structure is reshaping Ethereum’s practical usability as a general-purpose settlement layer.

Looking back over the past year, the number of active addresses on Ethereum has increased by approximately 71% year-over-year, steadily rising from 460,000. Meanwhile, the network’s daily transaction volume also hit a new high, with 2.1 million transactions in a single day. In comparison, between 2021 and 2022, due to the explosive growth of DeFi and NFTs, Gas fees soared to hundreds of dollars, sparking widespread market doubts about Ethereum’s scalability.

Since then, Ethereum has continuously improved its underlying performance through multiple protocol upgrades. The Pectra upgrade implemented in May 2025 significantly increased Blob capacity and reduced the costs of publishing data on Rollups; the Fusaka upgrade activated in December of the same year further expanded Blob limits and introduced a peer-to-peer data availability sampling mechanism, making the verification process more efficient. Driven by these upgrades, developers’ willingness to deploy contracts on Ethereum has noticeably increased. Token Terminal data shows that in Q4 2025, the number of new smart contracts deployed on Ethereum reached about 8.7 million, setting a new record.

In terms of competition, Ethereum is engaging in direct competition with Layer 1 networks such as Solana, BNB Chain, and Tron. These networks each have advantages in transaction throughput and retail user activity, but Ethereum is consolidating its position through a “settlement layer-first” strategy.

Recently, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin also proposed the “exit test” concept, emphasizing that the network should have the ability to operate stably over the long term even if developers no longer maintain it frequently. He pointed out that achieving resistance to quantum attacks, scalable architecture, and a sustainable proof-of-stake model are all goals that Ethereum must gradually realize in the future.

Looking ahead to 2026, the upcoming Glamsterdam fork is expected to introduce more efficient parallel processing mechanisms and significantly increase block capacity. Overall, as upgrades continue, the revival of activity on the Ethereum mainnet is likely to become a long-term trend, and its “bulletproof” roadmap is moving from vision to reality.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

ETH Short-term Decline of 0.86%: Selling Pressure Triggered by Resonance Between Increased Exchange Inflows and Long Liquidations

Between 2026-03-17 03:30 and 03:45 (UTC), ETH experienced significant price volatility with a 15-minute return of -0.86%. The price range was between 2314.41 and 2336.61 USDT, with a fluctuation amplitude of 0.95%. During this period, market attention intensified, trading activity increased significantly, and short-term volatility intensified. The primary driver of this volatility was a large inflow of ETH into a major exchange, creating spot selling pressure and driving trading volume to increase substantially compared to the previous period (trading volume increased 30% to 650,000 ETH). Simultaneously, leveraged long positions in the derivatives market

GateNews2m ago

Matrixport: ETH Cumulative Pullback of 63% This Round, Options Gamma Hedging as Main Driver of Recent Rebound

Ethereum has declined 63% cumulatively in this cycle, reaching a low of $1,837, and is currently testing technical resistance levels. Price recovery is driven by options flow and gamma hedging, while fundamentals have not shown significant changes. ETF demand is recovering, but derivatives positioning continues to influence price action. Ethereum's movement has decoupled from traditional assets.

GateNews18m ago

South Korea Police Agency Sets First-Ever Dark Coin Management Guidelines, Virtual Assets Compressed by Approximately 54.5 Billion Korean Won Over Past 5 Years

Korea's National Police Agency completes draft virtual asset management directive, first time including dark coin management and clarifying software wallet solutions. Over the past 5 years, virtual assets worth approximately 54.5 billion won have been seized, with police planning to select private custodian institutions. Experts recommend establishing a government-led custody system.

GateNews24m ago

Slippage: The Most Underestimated Profit Killer in Trading

Author: CryptoPunk Many crypto traders have experienced the same disappointment: strategies that appear stable and profitable in backtests quickly see their returns shrink when actually deployed, sometimes turning from profit into loss. The issue is often not "misjudging the direction," but underestimating trading costs, especially slippage. In crypto markets where bull and bear phases switch more rapidly, volatility is more intense, and order books are more fragmented, slippage is not a trivial decimal point—it is the real threshold that determines whether a strategy can survive. A deviation of just 2 or 3 basis points can, in high-turnover strategies, completely wipe out the theoretical alpha. Based on long-term backtests of BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, this article aims to answer a very practical question: to what extent does slippage erode strategy returns, and which strategies are most likely to be killed by slippage? 1. Introduction: Why Slippage

PANews51m ago
Comment
0/400
No comments