On February 14, Kevin O’Leary won a default judgment in a defamation case against Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong in the Southern District of Florida Federal Court, receiving a total award of $2.8 million. The court found that the defendant’s posting of “malicious” false accusations and private information on social media constituted serious defamation and punitive damages.
The ruling awarded O’Leary $750,000 in emotional distress damages, $78,000 in reputation damages, and an additional $2 million in punitive damages. The judge noted that as a public figure engaged in media and business collaborations, damage to O’Leary’s reputation would directly impact his performance invitations and business relationships. Expert testimony, based on the viewership of the relevant posts, the size of the affected audience, and repair costs, estimated the reputation loss at $78,000.
The dispute originated from multiple posts made by Armstrong in March 2025, accusing O’Leary of involvement in a fatal boat accident in 2019, and publicly sharing his private phone number in one post, urging fans to “call the murderer in real life.” The court found that O’Leary was only a passenger at the time and was not prosecuted; his wife was also declared innocent after the trial. The accident investigation indicated that another boat had no lights at the time. After the phone number was leaked, O’Leary received hundreds of calls, leading to an annual security expense of approximately $200,000 and changes to his travel and work routines for safety reasons.
Procedurally, O’Leary filed suit on March 26, 2025; service was completed by March 28. Armstrong repeatedly failed to respond within the deadline, despite court extensions and clear warnings, and did not submit a response. The clerk entered a default on May 6. A damages hearing was held on October 30, with Armstrong still absent. He later sought to dismiss the case citing detention and bipolar disorder, but the court found he had been properly notified, delayed nearly a year, and was harming the plaintiff’s interests, and thus dismissed the motion.
This case serves as a warning: spreading false accusations and “doxxing” others on social media can lead to high damages and long-term legal consequences. The parties involved include Kevin O’Leary, Ben “BitBoy” Armstrong, and O’Leary’s public role as an investor on “Shark Tank.”
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Kalshi Files Lawsuit Against Iowa Regulators
Kalshi has sued Iowa regulators, claiming that they may impose restrictions on its federally regulated sports-related event contracts, risking enforcement action against the platform. This legal battle underscores the tension between state and federal oversight of prediction markets.
TodayqNews1m ago
Refuse to risk lives! U.S. lawmakers introduce legislation banning market prediction wars & death bets
U.S. Senator Adam Schiff has introduced the "Death Betting Act," which fully bans contracts related to terrorism, war, and death in prediction markets. The aim is to eliminate CFTC's regulatory flexibility and prevent national security risks. This move is a direct challenge to the recent relaxation of regulation by the CFTC and emphasizes that such bets will facilitate insider profits and are detrimental to public interest. This bill and similar actions are intended to respond to the ethical controversies sparked by prediction markets.
CryptoCity15m ago
Court hearing as early as October! U.S. prosecutors seek a retrial of Tornado co-founder, previously charged with laundering $1 billion.
The U.S. Department of Justice has requested a reexamination of the money laundering and sanctions case against Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm, with a court date expected in October 2026. Although he has filed a motion for a not guilty verdict, prosecutors still emphasize the need to determine a reexamination date as soon as possible. Roman Storm remains resolute, emphasizing that he faces serious charges due to open-source code.
CryptoCity40m ago
Prediction Market Kalshi Sues Iowa Attorney General and Racing and Gaming Commission
Prediction market Kalshi sues Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird and the Gaming Commission in federal court, claiming to face enforcement risks, asserting that federal law takes precedence over state law, and has engaged in legal disputes with regulators in multiple states.
GateNews1h ago
AI scams escalate! Cryptocurrency ATM fraud losses may reach $333 million in 2025, with US complaints soaring by 33%
The report shows that with the use of AI and deepfake technology, cryptocurrency ATM scams in the United States are rapidly increasing, with losses expected to reach $333 million by 2025. Crypto ATMs are widely exploited due to low authentication standards, with seniors being significantly affected. The scams are diverse, and AI technology has enhanced the efficiency of fraud. Regulators have begun to pay attention and have proposed relevant legislation to strengthen protections.
GateNews1h ago
Kalshi sues Iowa regulators as legal dispute over the legality of sports event contracts in prediction markets escalates
Prediction market platform Kalshi has filed a lawsuit in Iowa, alleging that regulators may restrict the operation of its sports event contract products and asserting federal law takes precedence. The company did not receive a commitment not to take enforcement action after meeting with government officials and faces legal risks. Different states have varying regulatory attitudes toward such contracts, and court rulings are inconsistent, with ongoing disputes over their legal status.
GateNews1h ago
