# TrumpTariffRuling

If tariffs are implemented, the biggest impact may not necessarily be on the export countries. The market generally believes that if Trump's tariffs are officially implemented in 2026, the first to be affected could be countries and companies that rely heavily on exports to the US. However, historical experience shows that the true hidden costs often flow back to the US domestic market. Tariffs increase import costs, ultimately borne by consumers and businesses, raising inflation expectations and squeezing the purchasing power of low- and middle-income groups.
This is also why the Federal Rese

#TrumpTariffRuling
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to soon rule on the legality of the tariffs imposed during the Trump era, and markets are closely watching because this is not just a legal technicality but could broadly change economic conditions.
What’s at stake
The court’s ruling on whether President Trump exceeded his authority by imposing broad tariffs through emergency powers.
There is a strong market sentiment that the court may overturn these tariffs.
If that happens, the government could face massive tax refund liabilities to importers, with estimates reaching up to $150–200 bill

#TrumpTariffRuling
The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on the legality of the Trump‑era tariffs, and markets are watching closely because this isn’t just a legal technicality it could shift economic conditions more broadly.
What’s at stake
The Court is reviewing whether President Trump overstepped his authority by imposing broad tariffs through emergency powers.
There’s significant market sentiment that the Court may strike these tariffs down.
If this happens, the government could owe massive tax refunds to importers estimates suggest up to $150–$200 billion and that has big ma

Tariff rulings demonstrate changes in the global order. Trump's tariff decisions are not only about trade but also serve as a mirror reflecting the shift of the global order from "efficiency first" to "security first." Regardless of the outcome, de-risking, supply chain diversification, and economic bloc formation have become irreversible trends. In this context, the market should not interpret tariff policies solely as "bullish" or "bearish," but should pay attention to the underlying institutional signals. For enterprises, this is a stress test for strategic adjustments; for investors, it si

Under the expectation of tariffs, the capital market is preemptively "taking sides." Based on recent capital flows, a clear trend can be observed: assets benefiting from traditional globalization are being re-evaluated, while domestically-focused, regional, and resource-autonomous industries are gradually gaining premiums. This change is not overnight but is based on long-term pricing of policy uncertainties. Hedge funds and institutional investors are not betting on a single outcome but are hedging extreme policy risks through diversified layouts. In other words, although the tariff rulings h

Tariffs are not the end point but rather the opening move in a certain game strategy.
As the 2026 tariff ruling approaches, the market is superficially discussing "whether to add tariffs and how much," but the true core has never been about the tariff rates themselves, rather about the game strategy. Tariffs are more like a political lever and negotiation tool rather than purely an economic policy. Looking back at past governance logic, tariffs are often used to create uncertainty, forcing opponents to make concessions, while also demonstrating a "tough stance" to domestic voters. Therefore, t