Flying_BTC

#MF This drop isn’t accompanied by volume—it’s just a volatility rebound. The project has just started, so these sell-off moments are prime buying opportunities. This is a DIP, and it’s OK. I’m DCA-ing and loading up.

#PROMPT Wayfinder lacks transparency on prediction accuracy metrics. July-Aug 2025 vesting may increase token supply 2.5x, risking price dilution. Only ~28,000 active wallets suggest overstated adoption. Security audit details remain unclear.

#ALPINE The Alpine F1 team’s token surged due to a Binance-backed collaboration, not genuine fan support. It’s just pump-and-dump (lol). Where’s the passionate engagement for a perennial underdog like Alpine? Their driver Franco’s already crashed this year … The token’s down 95% from its ATH—pure garbage. Sell it

#LIORA another scam project. shit coin…

#NAORIS Targeting the promising field of Post-Quantum security, but lacking a White Paper, with an opaque track record of the development team, and no schedule for the Mainnet launch. Meanwhile, only the advisors are flashy. The core aspects of important technology development are unclear, and projects that showcase such advisors as mere advertising figures should be approached with caution. At the very least, they should have something out on LinkedIn. Even if they process 98 million transactions on the Testnet, the hurdles for the Mainnet are high. Is this just another meme coin?

#HYPER If you really think this is legitimate, that's a joke. This project is a scam project that manages accounts holding 70%. This time they are pumping again during the unlock on July 23, be careful not to be lured into buying ⚠️

#CROSS CROSS is concluded to have a very high possibility of being a scam. The following reasons are cited:
• There are no live games or tangible products, and the announced titles are not playable.
• There are reports that the team controls a large portion of the supply, with no vesting or liquidity locks, which increases the risk of pump and dump.
• On social media, there are indications of fake partnerships, unfulfilled airdrops, and suppression of critical voices, leading to a perception of low credibility.
• There are concerns about the lack of official information and rebuttals, as wel

#AIN
• The token distribution of $AIN (Infinity Ground) is allocated 28% to Partners & Creators, 10.4% to the Team, and 3% to Liquidity, which poses a high risk of insider control.
• The circulating supply is approximately 18.53% of the total supply (185.3 million AIN), with the remaining 81.47% not yet in circulation.
• Due to low liquidity (3%), there are concerns about the potential for price manipulation and market instability.
• The vesting schedule has been confirmed for some parts (e.g., airdrops), but details regarding Team and Partners & Creators are unclear.
Red light is on!!

#RCADE There is no White Paper. The development team is not disclosed. They raised 32.55 million Dollar in the IEO, but it is not enough for AAA class game development. Moreover, despite being GAMEFI, there is zero vesting. ( This means that tokens can be sold immediately upon release. ) Yet, the details of the tokenomics are also unclear... It will be interesting to see what happens when Binance lists an Alpha without any guarantees.

#PAL Despite the 23028% oversubscription in the Binance Alpha IDO, it is a tragedy below the presale price...

#M The details of the "memes influence measurement Algorithm" at the core of PoM have not been disclosed.
In the first place, is it possible for PoM to select valuable memes and build a sustainable economy in a market where tens of thousands of tokens are issued every day?
How does POM intend to clear the current situation where 99.9% of tokens disappear in a day?
MEMEs tend to rely on speculative and short-term trends, but what is the practicality of MemeCore's "Meme 2.0" beyond market speculation?
The PoM reward system can be abused through wash trading, staking spoofing, and bot-driven soc

#AIN New coin flooding, #BinanceAlpha will launch on July 5
@infinityg_ai
How to analyze the coin price valuation and trading operations of $AIN?
Background: A seamless AI-driven Web3 native platform, colloquially "one-click Dapp deployment"
Financing: Round 1 $2M, Asian VC
Business: 17M+ independent wallet addresses, 121K+ Web3 Dapps
Tokenomics: VC accounts for 9.9%, and the project party holds at least 60% of the coins.
The basic utility is there, but the burn + stake reward + token release rules linked to performance are all quite vague and outdated.
Community: X 220K, TG 260K
Valuation: 1

#AIN A project worth noting as an AI-driven Web3 development platform, which provides the Agentic IDE to build DApps without coding, claims that 172,869 WEB3 applications have already been born through its innovative approach that merges AI and Web3. However, due to the Anonymity of the development team (no member information in RootData), there is a lack of technical reliability and transparency in leadership. The substantial "centrality" is likely to depend on the community size and the buzz generated by marketing, and the technical details (specifications of the AI model, scalability verif

#ICNT
Team (22.1%): 154.7 million tokens have a 12-month cliff (lock-up period) followed by a 24-month linear release, with 14% released immediately.
It is stated that 14% of 22.1% (approximately 21,058,000 tokens) will be released immediately.
$0.32 × (167,220,000 ÷ 187,220,000) ≈ $0.286 (approximately $0.29)
Assuming a slippage of 10–20%, with 15% applied: • $0.286 × (1 - 0.15) ≈ $0.243 (approximately $0.24)
Would the range of $0.24–$0.29 be the target?

#CROSS
The current price of $0.06 is 40% lower than the presale price ($0.10), so be cautious as there is little room for further decline. With a funding rate of -2.5%, if a short squeeze occurs, be prepared to sell on the rebound.