Gate 广場「創作者認證激勵計畫」優質創作者持續招募中!
立即加入,發布優質內容,參與活動即可瓜分月度 $10,000+ 創作獎勵!
認證申請步驟:
1️⃣ 打開 App 首頁底部【廣場】 → 點擊右上角頭像進入個人首頁
2️⃣ 點擊頭像右下角【申請認證】,提交申請等待審核
立即報名:https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
豪華代幣獎池、Gate 精美周邊、流量曝光等超過 $10,000 的豐厚獎勵等你拿!
活動詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Court Trial Dates Set for SEC_s Case Against Ripple Labs in Southern District of New York
In December 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple and its two utives, CEO Brad Garlinghouse and co-founder Chris Larsen, for an unregistered $1.3 billion securities offering by selling XRP, a token created by Ripple’s founders in 2012. This move led several exchanges to remove XRP from their listings to prevent legal issues.
However, in this case, on July 13th, Judge Torres ruled that XRP sales on public crypto exchanges weren’t securities offerings because buyers didn’t expect profits tied to Ripple’s efforts.
Torres cited a Supreme Court case that classifies investments in profits from others’ efforts in a shared enterprise as securities
Ripple’s XRP sales, including those by utives and for employee compensation, were determined not to be securities when conducted through programmatic sales on digital asset exchanges
Although the court ruling isn’t a conclusive verdict in the SEC v. Ripple case, Garlinghouse, Larsen, and the blockchain firm could still face liability for other breaches; many companies have relisted XRP or shown intentions to do so.
SEC to Appeal Judge’s Decision on Ripple’s XRP Sales Ruling
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced its intention to pursue an “interlocutory appeal” in response to the recent legal decision regarding Ripple’s XRP sales
The decision by Judge Torres, which deemed XRP sales on public crypto exchanges not to be securities offerings, has ed the SEC to seek further action. The expression of disappointment by SEC Chair Gary Gensler over the ruling last month further underscores the regulator’s intent to challenge the decision.
The SEC aims to appeal specific aspects of the ruling while allowing other parts of the case to proceed to trial
The interlocutory appeal seeks an appellate court’s review of decisions made during the ongoing SEC vs. Ripple case to potentially prevent the need for separate trials for both the SEC and the government.
“The SEC seeks to certify the Court’s holding that Defendants’ ‘Programmatic’ offers and sales to XRP buyers over crypto asset trading platforms and Ripple’s ‘Other Distributions’ in exchange for labor and services did not involve the offer or sale of securities,” the SEC said in a court filing. “Interlocutory review is warranted here.”
Furthermore, the SEC highlighted divisions within the Southern District of New York to justify the need for the interlocutory appeal