On February 12, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a $4 million fine against peer-to-peer encryption platform Paxful. The company previously admitted that, lacking anti-money laundering and customer due diligence mechanisms, it had long transferred funds for criminals and profited directly from these activities. The related funds are alleged to be connected to human trafficking, scams, extortion, and illegal prostitution activities.
Prosecutors disclosed that between January 2017 and September 2019, Paxful facilitated over 26 million transactions totaling nearly $3 billion, earning approximately $29.7 million in revenue. The Department of Justice pointed out that the company had promoted its platform as “no identity verification required” and published anti-money laundering policies that were not actually implemented, thereby attracting high-risk customers.
Investigations revealed that Paxful had partnerships with the seized illegal classified ad website Backpage and similar platforms. The U.S. Department of Justice stated that its founder privately boasted that the “Backpage effect” drove platform growth. Between 2015 and 2022 alone, such collaborations generated about $2.7 million in profit for the platform.
Initially, prosecutors believed a fine of $112.5 million was appropriate, but considering the company’s cessation of operations and inability to pay, the final penalty was set at $4 million. Paxful shut down at the end of 2025. The company attributed its collapse in a statement to misconduct by former management and high compliance remediation costs.
Former co-founder Ray Youssef responded that the platform had fallen into an irreversible crisis before his departure. Another co-founder and former CTO, Artur Schaback, admitted in 2024 to conspiracy for failing to maintain an anti-money laundering system and is currently awaiting sentencing.
This case is seen as another landmark event in the U.S. strengthening enforcement of crypto compliance, sending a clear signal to the industry: platforms that ignore anti-money laundering obligations will face dual pressure from criminal and regulatory authorities.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Kalshi legal woes grow with Washington state gambling suit
Kalshi is facing another state-level lawsuit after the state of Washington on Friday filed allegations that the prediction market operator violated state gambling laws with its products.
The Washington Attorney General’s complaint cites the Pacific Northwest state’s existing ban on online gambling
Cointelegraph39m ago
No one is 100% happy with the stablecoin yield agreement: State of Crypto
Industry representatives recently reviewed the crypto market structure bill's proposed yield language, prompting mixed reactions. The legislation is set to progress with a markup anticipated in April, though concerns about its implications persist.
CoinDesk3h ago
Canada moves to ban crypto donations for election campaigns following UK
Canada’s federal government has moved to ban cryptocurrency donations to political campaigns, shutting down a fundraising channel that appears to have seen little to no real-world use in the country's previous elections.
Bill C-25, the Strong and Free Elections Act, introduced March 26, would
CoinDesk4h ago
Gavin Newsom Bans California Public Officials From Prediction Market Insider Trading
In brief
California public officials are banned via executive order from using inside information to make money on prediction markets.
The ban extends to state officials and appointees using information to help others from profiting, as well.
The order follows continued scrutiny from
Decrypt5h ago
Crypto's CLARITY Act could be a headwind for DeFi tokens ring-fencing yield, analyst says
The Clarity Act's proposed stablecoin rules may hinder decentralized finance (DeFi) by banning yield on stablecoin balances, re-centralizing yield to traditional financial institutions. This could reduce competition and impact DeFi platforms, while benefiting infrastructure players like Circle.
CoinDesk5h ago
Frequent "precise trading" was observed before Trump's major announcement, and several experts are calling for a thorough investigation.
During Trump’s tenure, traders made precise moves ahead of his major policy announcements and could have profited millions of dollars. Legal experts say these trades look suspicious and should be investigated for information leaks to protect market fairness.
BlockBeatNews8h ago
