February 25 News: The Delhi High Court recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by a group of cryptocurrency investors against a certain crypto platform. Judge Prushaindra Kumar Kaurav stated that the platform is a private company and does not meet the definition of a “state” entity under Article 12 of the Constitution. Therefore, it cannot be subject to judicial intervention under Article 226, and the petition lacks a legal basis for acceptance.
The lawsuit was initiated by investors including Rana Handa and Aditya Malhotra, requesting the court to strengthen regulation of the crypto platform, and to direct the CBI or a special investigation team to investigate. They also asked for the freezing of user funds that were reportedly restricted. However, the court clearly indicated that ordering a criminal investigation is an extremely special circumstance, and some complaints have not even completed the FIR process, which is insufficient to trigger a mandatory investigation.
The core dispute in the case concerns withdrawal restrictions. Several users reported difficulty in withdrawing funds from the platform since 2025, with issues such as account valuation discrepancies and limit adjustments. Rana Handa told the court that he invested approximately 1.422 million rupees in 2021, but subsequent withdrawal obstacles led to widespread doubts about the platform’s liquidity and compliance. Affected investors had previously filed complaints through the National Cyber Crime Portal and eventually turned to legal channels to seek justice.
The court also emphasized that the regulation of cryptocurrencies falls under legislative and policy matters, which should be formulated by Parliament and regulatory agencies such as RBI and SEBI, rather than by the judiciary proactively creating rules. In the absence of clear regulations, the court prefers to guide parties to resolve disputes through traditional legal pathways such as civil lawsuits, consumer complaints, or police reports.
From an industry perspective, this ruling highlights the legal gray area caused by the still-developing crypto regulatory framework in India. For investors facing frozen funds, withdrawal difficulties, or platform disputes, obtaining quick relief through constitutional litigation becomes significantly more challenging. Legal experts generally agree that this decision follows existing constitutional principles but also amplifies concerns about the lack of crypto asset regulation, investor fund safety risks, and platform compliance reviews. It is expected that legislative discussions and regulatory policy battles will continue to intensify into 2026.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Pakistan's Parliament passes the Virtual Assets Act 2026, officially establishing the Cryptocurrency Regulatory Authority PVARA
ChainCatcher News: The Pakistani Parliament officially passed the "Virtual Assets Bill 2026," announcing the establishment of the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA), responsible for licensing and regulating virtual asset service providers within the country.
The bill aims to protect investors, combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and promote fintech innovation, aligning Pakistan's regulatory standards with international practices. PVARA was previously a temporary agency established by a presidential order in July 2025; this legislation marks its formal legalization.
GateNews18m ago
The Central Bank of Russia proposes allowing banks and brokerage firms to obtain cryptocurrency trading licenses
Russia plans to legislate cryptocurrency trading regulation, with the central bank governor proposing to allow qualified banks and brokerage firms to obtain trading licenses, establish compliance systems, monitor fund flows, and control risks. This new regulation aims to be implemented by July 2026 to promote the legalization of digital assets.
GateNews1h ago
South Korea launches crypto management program for 2026
The Financial Services Commission of South Korea held its first virtual assets committee meeting of 2026 on March 4 in Seoul, discussing cryptocurrency legislation and reviewing a draft of the Digital Asset Basic Act.
TapChiBitcoin1h ago
Chainalysis: 700% surge in cryptocurrency-based sanctions evasion behaviors by 2025
Chainalysis report shows that in 2025, crypto-related illegal activities linked to sanctions increased significantly, with sanctioned entities receiving $104 billion in cryptocurrency, driving the total illegal on-chain transaction volume for the year to $154 billion. Sanctioned countries such as Russia, Iran, and North Korea are using cryptocurrencies to evade financial sanctions, with stablecoins accounting for as much as 84% of illegal transactions.
GateNews1h ago
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins states: Looking forward to collaborating with CFTC to advance the CLARITY Act
Gate News reports that on March 6, U.S. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins posted on X platform stating that President Trump’s view that the United States needs clear regulatory rules for the digital asset market is correct. He pointed out that the CLARITY Act helps ensure entrepreneurs can develop next-generation financial technologies within the United States. Paul Atkins expressed his look forward to working with CFTC Chairman Mike Selig to promote the implementation of the CLARITY Act in the near future.
GateNews1h ago
SEC Sends New Crypto Securities Guidance to White House
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission submitted interpretive crypto guidance to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for interagency review.
The proposal explains how securities laws may apply to crypto transactions and token classifications without creating new federal
CryptoFrontNews1h ago
