Bipartisan Bill Seeks To Shield Blockchain Developers From Criminal Liability

DEFI-8,67%
  • New bill protects non-custodial developers from unfair prosecution.
  • Clarifies that Section 1960 applies only to those who control customer funds.
  • Bill draws a line between coders and money transmitters.
  • Backers say it safeguards U.S. crypto innovation.

US lawmakers have introduced the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026 to protect software developers from criminal prosecution. The measure, which aims to draw a boundary between entities that control user funds and those who merely write code, includes a provision that the DeFi sector has long pressed for to be part of the CLARITY Act

Drawing the Line Between Developers and Money Transmitters

On Friday, Reps. Scott Fitzgerald, Zoe Lofgren, and Ben Cline introduced the novel bill to block the prosecution of software developers who write code, as opposed to those who hold and transmit customers’ assets. The legislation clarifies that Section 1960 of the Criminal Code only applies to developers who handle funds

It applies to individuals or entities that transfer funds on behalf of others without proper state licenses or that fail to comply with federal registration requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) obligations. The law is commonly used to prosecute illegal money transmission schemes, including those involving digital assets, when operators are found to be moving or controlling customer funds without authorization.

ADVERTISEMENTSection 1960 refers to 18 U.S.C. § 1960 of the federal criminal code, which classifies as criminal activity the operation of unlicensed money transmitting businesses. It makes it unlawful for anyone or any entity to transfer funds for others without the requisite state licenses and federal compliance requirements, including anti-money-laundering (AML) provisions

Authorities often invoke the provision to pursue unlawful money transmission schemes, including crypto-related cases, where individuals are accused of holding or moving customer funds without regulatory clearance.

The bill presents regulatory clarity to the debate of whether non-custodial developers should be prosecuted the same way as custodial actors. It aligns with the initial intent of Section 1960 and represents Congressional and judicial consensus on the matter

ADVERTISEMENT## Protecting Innovation While Targeting Criminal Activity

While section 1960 originally applied to custodial developers, the cases of Tornado Cash and Samourai Wallet, where the law was applied to developers who wrote only code, necessitated the clear boundaries the bill establishes.

“For too long,” said Rep. Cline, “federal overreach has blurred the line between bad actors and the innovators building next-generation technology.”

“This bipartisan bill restores needed clarity by protecting developers who don’t control customer funds, while ensuring law enforcement can continue to target real criminals. I’m proud to support this effort to keep America the global leader in blockchain innovation.”

Over the past few years, experts raised an alarm over a massive outflow of American developers to other jurisdictions due to the fear of unfair prosecution. Once the new legislation gets passed, it will ensure the protection of these non-custodial developers, and by extension, secure the future of American leadership in the digital asset space.

ADVERTISEMENT

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

Paul Atkins Outlines SEC-CFTC Plan to Reduce Compliance Duplication

U.S. regulators SEC and CFTC are harmonizing oversight to reduce duplicate compliance, proposing “substituted compliance” for overlapping obligations. The initiative focuses on areas like prediction markets and digital assets, aiming for seamless regulation while retaining agency independence.

CryptoFrontNews18m ago

GNLU Report Urges India to Create Crypto Regulatory Framework

A report from Gujarat National Law University advocates for a structured regulatory framework for crypto-assets in India, addressing the current reliance on taxation and fragmented oversight. It highlights the need for legal clarity to foster growth and innovation in the digital asset sector.

TodayqNews1h ago

Crypto Regulation Shift? CFTC Unveils New Market Vision

CFTC Chair Michael Selig's plan aims to modernize U.S. financial markets by implementing clear crypto regulations, supporting tokenized assets, and enhancing oversight, fostering innovation while ensuring investor protection.

Coinfomania1h ago

Ghana Launches Yearlong Crypto Pilot With 11 Companies

Ghana has launched a year-long crypto pilot program to regulate digital assets through a controlled sandbox for 11 service providers, aiming to enhance investor protection and financial inclusion while observing trading activity.

Coinfomania1h ago

India Weighs Five Models for Crypto Regulation: Report

Gujarat National Law University report highlights lack of a dedicated crypto law despite taxation and AML rules in India. Study proposes five regulatory models including SEBI oversight, RBI control, multi-regulator system, or a new authority. Nearly 12 crore Indians use crypto,

CryptoFrontNews3h ago

Crypto Performs the Same Role As Finance- ASIC Fintech Chief

A senior official at Australia's corporate regulator argues that blockchain and cryptocurrencies should not be seen as a separate asset class but rather as part of existing financial services, advocating for regulations based on economic functions instead of technology.

TodayqNews3h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments